Elementary clinical study of external low frequency electric pulse stimulation treating diabetic cystopathy

WEI Zhong-qing,WANG Yong-sheng,DING Liu-cheng,HUANG Yi,SHEN Bai-xin,YI Chao-ran,SUN Ze-yu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0785.2013.03.013
2013-01-01
Abstract:Objective To investigate the effect of external low frequency electric pulse stimulation on the patients with DCP by the methods of urodynamic and B-type ultrasonic inspection,and explore an optimal and noninvasive therapeutic method for the treatment of patients with diabetic cystopathy.Methods Totally 30 patients with diabetic cystopathy admitted to Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital from June 2008 to March 2011 were randomly grouped into experiment and control group with 15 cases in each.All patients were signed the informed consent.Patients in control group were treated with DM normal treatment accompanied by bladder training or indwelling urethral,while the external low frequency electric pulse stimulation by LGT-1000A were applied in the experiment group besides the methods used in the control group:voltage 36-70 V,pulse stimulation rate 25-65 Hz,at the bladder horns and the backside and foreside of the bladder,once for 40 minutes,twice a day,5 days in one period,1-2 days break,totally 2-3 period.The urodynamic examination by Laborie Medical Technologies′ apparatus were treated to the patients of both groups before and after the treatment,and the post-voided residual volume(PVR),the maximum urinary flow rate,the maximum pressure of detrusor and the PVR/Vmax were used as the main indices in evaluation of the therapeutic effect.Results After a session of treatment,the effectiveness of experiment group(73.3%)was higher than the control group(53.3%),P<0.05.The changes of PVR(ΔPVR)of the treatment group[(118.6±33.4)ml]was significantly different from the ΔPVR of control group[(54.9±14.2)ml,P<0.05].The PVR/Vmax of experiment group reduced significantly[(32.2±11.8)% vs.(61.0±19.1)%,P<0.01],while there was no significant reduce in the control group[(42.6±12.4)% vs.(55.6±21.1)%,P>0.05].Urodynamic indices:the maximal urinary flow rate of experiment group[(6.7±2.3)ml/s]was higher than before[(3.9±1.3)ml/s,P<0.05],while the maximal urinary flow rate of control group[(5.2±2.5)ml/s]was a little higher than before[(3.6±1.7)ml/s,P>0.05];The maximal pressure of detrusor of both groups[(17.9±4.6)cm H2O]was higher than before[(11.9±3.3)cm H2O,P<0.01],while the maximal pressure of detrusor of control groups[(14.4±1.9)cm H2O]was higher than before[(12.1±2.0)cm H2O,P<0.01].Conclusions The PVR of the patient with DCP can be reduced after the external low frequency electric pulse stimulation therapy and favourable effect can also be expected in treating DCP adynamia of detrusor muscle.This method can improve DCP patients′vesical dysfunction and enhance patients′life quality and survival rate without triggering significant side effects.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?