Informal Reasoning Differences Between Excellent College Debaters and Non-debaters

ZHANG Qi,ZHANG Li,WANG Yi,ZHANG Yan-jun,MA Yan-ping,SUN Bao-hong
2009-01-01
Abstract:This study was designed to investigate informal reasoning differences between college debaters and non-debaters.Two ill-structured problem tests were administered to the participants by argument prompting method.The results showed as follows:(1) most college students achieved refuting reasoning level.The majority of debaters were at the level of indirect refuting reasoning and the majority of non-debaters were at the level of direct refuting reasoning.During my-side and other-side reasoning,debaters generated significantly more functional and conditional reasons than non-debaters and there were significant differences in the span of reason field between the debaters and non-debaters;during refuting reasoning,debaters generated significantly more indirect refuting than the non-debaters,so the debaters' informal reasoning ability were higher than the non-debaters;(2) The measuring system used in this study can differentiate debaters' informal reasoning ability from the non-debaters,so it was an appropriate method to measure students' informal reasoning.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?