Abstract:How did revolutions facilitate empires’ transition to nation-states? This article compares the Bolshevik and the Chinese Communist Revolutions. It conceptualizes this Soviet–Sino comparison through three dimensions of nation-building: separating from a universal community, building a national cultural core and overcoming internal ethnopolitics. Both socialist regimes accommodated the nation-state model by fusing centralized control with limited autonomy for ethnic minorities. Yet, whereas the Soviet Union claimed to be a universal union of nation-states, which was supposed to keep accepting new members until it covered the entire globe, the People’s Republic of China resembled a typical nation-state that preserved multiethnicity and enclosed borders under the title of the ‘Chinese Nation’. In analyzing the influence of revolutions, this article probes three relations: inter-revolution, revolution–society and revolution–counterrevolution. Arising after the Bolsheviks as a follower-revolution, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) was confined to a national component of the USSR’s global communism project. This shaped the CCP’s enclosed geographical activity space, Han-dominated ethnic composition and the consciousness of national liberation. The CCP’s mobilization covered far wider social strata than the Bolsheviks’ had, which engendered stronger manpower and motivation to transform the traditional culture into a national culture. Being weak at its borderlands, the CCP was cautious about the doctrine of ‘national self-determination’, not daring to make it a geopolitical weapon for revolution export as the Bolsheviks had done in founding the Soviet Union. Owing to each of these differences in revolutionary trajectories, the CCP was more receptive to ‘China’ than the Bolsheviks were to ‘Russia’, and this led to two distinctive ways of reorganizing empires into nation-states.

The View Change of the October Revolution in Russia after the Breakup of Former Soveit Union

Political Change in Russia:The History,Ideological Foundation and Prospect

The October Revolution Opened a New Era of World History

The Formation of the Revolution:The Transition of the Last Ten Years of the Qing Dynasty(Part One)

20 Years after Eastern Europe's Radical Change:Review and Reflection

Rethinking and Reviving: the Modern Fate of Traditional Russian Values

Tensility of Revolution and Elasticity of History——New Explaination on the Soviet Area History

Historical Writing in Russian Postmodernist Fiction

The Historical Contribution of the October Revolution to the Economic and Social Development of the Soviet Union—Analysis of the Soviet Economic Model and the Causes of Its Dramatic End

The "Soviet Factor" in 1989 Political Upheaval of Eastern Europe

Developments in Russian Historical Studies in China since Reform and Opening-up

Breakage and Inheritance in Dramatic Changes——Reviewing Changes in Autonomy as Shown in The Old Regime and the Revolution

The Soviet Union and China in the 1980s: reconciliation and divorce

A Global Perspective of the Independence of Social Sciences in China

The Backwash of Tianxia-View on World-View:Changes in the Agendasetting of Shanghai Expo

The Inner Differences of Realism in Its Reestablishment Today

The October Revolution: Inspiration or Trauma for the New Left

The Re-understanding of the Revolution of 1911

Rethinking the Significance of the Russian and Chinese Revolutions: A Dialogue with Wang Hui

Evolution of the geographical image of the USSR in the presentation of Chinese writers (on example of Hu Shi and Chen Duxiu)

Revolution As a Transition from Empire to Nation-State(s): Comparing the Soviet and Chinese Paths