Therapeutic effect of routine emergency and remedial percutaneous coronary intervention on patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

SUN Yu-min,WANG Jun,ZHOU Yun,ZHANG Yan,HUANG Shao-hua,XU Zhi-qiang,TAO Wen-qi,CAO Bin,YU Shuai
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1008-0074.2013.01.15
2013-01-01
Abstract:Objective:To evaluate short-term efficacy and safety of routine emergency and remedial percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI) after failed urokinase thrombolysis in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction(STEMI).Methods:Basic data(including patients undergoing routine emergency and remedial PCI),main endpoint events within 30d after PCI and occurrence of severe hemorrhage complications were retrospectively analyzed in all patients undergoing emergency PCI in our hospital from Jun 2006 to Dec 2009.Results:A total of 134 patients underwent emergency PCI,among which 17 cases(12.68%) were transferred to our hospital for remedial PCI due to failed urokinase thrombolysis in other hospitals.Within 30d after PCI,there were seven cases(5.22%) occurred main endpoint events and six cases(4.48%) died.Multiple factor Logistic analysis indicated that coronary artery TIMI blood flow ≤grade 1 was significantly correlated with main endpoint events(OR=60.98,P<0.05).There were three cases(2.24%) occurring severe hemorrhage complications.Single factor Logistic analysis indicated that severe hemorrhage complications were not significantly correlated with remedial PCI(P>0.05 all).Conclusion:It′s safe and effective to perform remedial PCI after failed urokinase thrombolysis in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?