Abstract:In previous studies,few researchers paid attention to the role of incorrect worked-example in worked-example learning and failed to reach a conclusion.We thought that the outcomes would be better with a combination of correct and incorrect worked-examples than with the correct worked-examples only in worked-example learning.This hypothesis was tested by three experiments in this research which used hydrocarbon structural formulas of organic chemistry as the materials and high school students of grade one participatants.A single-factor design was implemented in each experiment.All the hydrocarbon structural formulas were selected from chemistry textbooks for Senior High Two.A total of 240 subjects were assigned to do the three experiments(60 in Experiment 1,90 in Experiment 2 and 90 participated in Experiment 3).They all participated in the pre-test,worked-example learning and post-test in quiet classrooms.The results are as follows:(1)Experiment 1 showed that the effect of combination of correct and incorrect worked-example learning was significantly better than the single correct worked-example learning;(2) Experiment 2 showed that the scores achieved from the combination which contained equal numbers of correct and incorrect worked-examples were significantly better than the scores achieved from the combination group in which the number of correct worked-examples was greater than that of incorrect ones.At the same time,the scores from the learning of combination which contained equal numbers of correct and incorrect worked-examples were significantly better than the scores achieved from the combination group in which the number of correct worked-examples was smaller than that of incorrect ones such as the proportion of correct and incorrect worked-examples was 2∶6 or 6∶2 in this study.In addition,the scores achieved from the combination group in which the number of correct worked-examples was larger than that of incorrect ones were higher than the scores achieved from the combination group in which the number of correct worked-examples was smaller than that of incorrect ones,though not significantly;(3) Experiment 3 showed that the effect was the most significant when correct and incorrect worked examples were matched;the effect obtained from the combination group in which correct worked examples were put before the incorrect ones was worse than the effect of the matched group;the effect obtained from the combination group in which correct worked examples were put after the incorrect ones was the worst.The conclusion of this study is that the learning outcomes could be promoted when appropriate incorrect worked-examples in worked-example learning are used.The effect is better when the number of correct and incorrect worked examples are the same in the correct example and incorrect worked examples learning of hydrocarbon covalent bond structural formula.Especially when one correct and one incorrect worked example are matched to be present,learners would get higher scores.

The Effect of Learning the Hydrocarbon Covalent Bond Structural Formula by Correct and Incorrect Combined Worked-examples

The application of combined teaching method of case-based learning and W2H2 thinking-type learning in the comparative morphology experiment teaching

Improving Students' Comprehensive Abilities by the Combination of Online Courses and On-site Experiment

Targeting fraction misconceptions and reducing high confidence errors in an online tutor

The influence of the order and congruency of correct and erroneous worked examples on learning and (meta-)cognitive load

Educational Practice on the Combination of Multi-experiments in Polymer Physics

Which Factor Promotes Cooperation:Comparison of Basic Elements in Cooperative Learning

Example-based learning: comparing the effects of additionally providing three different integrative learning activities on physiotherapy intervention knowledge

Constructing Models in Teaching of Chemical Bonds: Ionic Bond, Covalent Bond, Double and Triple Bonds, Hydrogen Bond and Molecular Geometry.

COMPARING THE EFFECTS OF MODELLING AND ANALOGY ON HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS’ CONTENT UNDERSTANDING AND TRANSFERABILITY: THE CASE OF ATOMIC STRUCTURE

The chemistry experimental teaching sufficiently achieving triple-combination

Comparative study of using 5E learning cycle and the traditional teaching method in chemistry to improve student understanding of water concept: The case of primary school

The Effect of Blended Learning Environment-based, Flipped Classroom Practice on College Students' Learning Performance

ONE HUNDRED CORE CONCEPTS IN CHEMISTRY AND UPPER-SECONDARY SCHOOL TEACHERS’ AND STUDENTS’ CHEMISTRY CONCEPTUAL STRUCTURES

The more, the better? Learning with feedback and instruction

The optimal learning strategy depends on learning goals and processes: Retrieval practice versus worked examples.

When All You Have Is a Covalent Model of Bonding, Every Substance Is a Molecule: A Longitudinal Study of Student Enactment of Covalent and Ionic Bonding Models

Investigating the impact of three-dimensional learning interventions on student understanding of structure–property relationships

Development and Assessment of a Molecular Structure and Properties Learning Progression

A Study of Intercategorial Polysemy Teaching Based on Conceptual Blending Theory in Senior High Schools

The Effect of Visual Mnemonics and the Presentation of Character Pairs on Learning Visually Similar Characters for Chinese-As-Second-Language Learners