Abstract:Exploring the conditions under which cooperation can emerge in populations has long been a subject for humans. Fair preference psychology has been incorporated into the analytical framework of the public goods game. Based on considering the dynamic update of trust-driven investment willingness, we introduce a dynamic payoff allocation mechanism and loners to traditional PGG, explaining how the mechanism related to fairness preferences promotes cooperation. We assume that payoffs are equally allocated among players when the payoffs do not exceed the threshold. Otherwise, the excess portion is proportionally allocated according to the investment willingness of cooperators. The effects of parameter changes on the evolution of cooperation are investigated by conducting Monte Carlo simulations. The results show that introducing dynamic payoff allocation and loners can effectively promote cooperation in a specific range of parameters. Specifically, the existence of loners is a double-edged sword. Loners can prevent players from adopting defection behaviors on a large scale when the payoff of cooperation is unsatisfied and inhibit the emergence and diffusion of cooperative strategies as the payoff of cooperators increases. When the payoff of cooperation is dissatisfactory, the dynamic payoff allocation mechanism can promote the average investment willingness of cooperators to accelerate the spread of cooperation. However, the payoff reallocation coefficient should not be set too high, and a high-level threshold of payoff reallocation may lead to the failure of the dynamic payoff allocation mechanism. There is an optimal payoff reallocation coefficient to maximize the efficiency of the proposed mechanism. Moreover, the optimal payoff reallocation coefficient that can maximize the cooperation level is distinct for the diverse combination of enhancement factor and loss aversion coefficient. However, its value should be set at a low level in general. These results may help researchers better understand the evolution of cooperation in public goods games with dynamic resource allocation from a fairness preference perspective.

Role of Collective Influence in Promoting Cooperation

Cooperation and Charity in Spatial Public Goods Game under Different Strategy Update Rules

Social Influence Promotes Cooperation in the Public Goods Game

Evolution of cooperation in public goods games with dynamic resource allocation: A fairness preference perspective

Evolution of cooperation in a heterogeneous population with influential individuals

Fostering Cooperation of Selfish Agents Through Public Goods in Relation to the Loners

Impact of Individual Difference and Investment Heterogeneity on the Collective Cooperation in the Spatial Public Goods Game

Adaptive and Bounded Investment Returns Promote Cooperation in Spatial Public Goods Games

The Evolution of Cooperation in Spatial Groups

Promotion of Cooperation Induced by Heterogeneity of Both Investment and Payoff Allocation in Spatial Public Goods Game

Effects Of Heterogeneous Wealth Distribution On Public Cooperation With Collective Risk

The Public Goods Game with a New Form of Shared Reward

Cooperation and Coordination in Heterogeneous Populations with Interaction Diversity.

Heterogeneity of allocation promotes cooperation in public goods games

Diversity of contribution promotes cooperation in public goods games

The evolution of cooperation in voluntary public goods game with shared-punishment

Effect of heterogeneous investments on the evolution of cooperation in spatial public goods game.

Emergence of Social Cooperation in Threshold Public Goods Games with Collective Risk.

Promoting Cooperation by Setting a Ceiling Payoff for Defectors under Three-Strategy Public Good Games.

When multi-group selection meets mystery of cooperation in structured public goods games

Evolutionary Dynamics Of Public Goods Games With Diverse Contributions In Finite Populations