The Role of Associated Meaning of Category in Inattentional Blindness

Luo Ting,Chen Zhencai,Chen Antao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.2013.03.022
2013-01-01
Abstract:Inattentional blindness(Mack & Rock,1998) describes a strong connection between attention and reports of visual awareness: observers are functionally blind to a fully-visible,unexpected object when their attention was engaged in another task,event,or object.This phenomenon,inattentional blindness,is striking and forces us to recognize that the content of the perceived visual world is enormously limited(Gu,Stocker,& Badler,2005).However,few factors have been identified which could reduce inattentional blindness and not all critical stimuli(CS) remained undetected under inattention.These factors are;(1) meaning of critical stimuli related to the task-relevant goal of the observers(Ansorge,Horstmann,& Carbone,2005);(2) the physical features such as the color or shape of the unexpected object are similar to those of the attended objects(Gu,et al.,2005);(3) Biologically or socially important stimuli,smiling faces or our names(Mack,Pappas,Silverman,& Gay,2002;Mack & Rock,1998).The current study aims to investigate that without attention set,whether the widely associated stimuli is able to promote attention and thus reduce blindness to important information.The experiment examines whether a task-irrelevant object has the ability to enhance our signal value for attention and improve visual awareness when primed with stimuli of the same category without a certain goal.79 students volunteering in our experiment were primed with 35 pictures belonging to one category which could be the same as the critical stimuli appearing in the critical trial when they do an alphabetical rearrangement task(refer to figure 1 for details).Three experimental trials later,a critical stimulus appeared on the screen without any notice in the forth trial(inattention trial).Immediately after the trial began,the rearrangement the CS was presented,subjects were asked whether they saw anything new that had not been presented on previous trials on the screen.If subjects reported that they saw something new,they were asked to identify it by choosing it from a list of 9 pictures and indicating the quadrant in which the critical stimulus stayed.The fifth trial(divided-attention trial) was the same as the forth trial except that(1) at the onset of this trial,subjects were explicitly instructed to both perform the rearrangement task and detect the CS during the task;(2) questions about the CS were asked until they completed the rearrangement task.The sixth trial(full-attention trial) proceeded the same way as the inattention trial except that the participants were instructed to ignore the rearrangement task and to pay attention only to the CS.In line with our prediction,the results showed that in comparison with priming in irrelevant category condition,subjects in the relevant condition were more likely to detect the critical stimuli in the inattention trial.The results indicate that previous relevant experience provides us with some preparation to support visual awareness even under inattention condition.In addition,the results show us widely associated meaning,not only socially derived associations,activated in our mind as an important factor for facilitating attention and visual awareness.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?