Abstract:The contributions of different sectors to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions are at the heart of the climate debate. In the coming decades, the implementation of low-carbon technology (LCT) solutions in key industries will play a pivotal role in mitigating climate change. This study develops a graphical approach that integrates carbon emissions pinch analysis (CEPA), the best-worst method (BWM), and cost-benefit analysis (CBA) to assess LCTs in key industries. CEPA is used to identify LCTs that meet both economic and GHG reduction constraints, then the LCTs selected by CEPA are subjected to CBA, while BWM is applied to assess the weighted performance of LCTs in terms of their environmental, economic, social, and technological aspects. A comparison of the implementation priority sequence of LCTs was made between the dual constraints of carbon and economic considerations and a multi-factor perspective (environmental impact, economic benefits, social impact, and technological aspects). Finally, by incorporating the marginal abatement cost curve (MACC), the optimal low-carbon and economically viable technological pathway can be determined. This study analyzed 85 LCTs from global industries, including the power, food, agriculture, and land use (FAL), industry, transportation, and construction industries. The results for the global scenario from 2020 to 2050 indicate that 38 LCTs have been screened by CEPA to meet the dual constraints of carbon and economic performance, resulting in a GHG emissions reduction of 328.0 Gt CO 2 -e. Among them, the power industry was the major contributor, with a cumulative reduction of 197.3 Gt CO 2 -e, followed by the construction industry (97.9 Gt CO 2 -e), industry (25.4 Gt CO 2 -e), transportation (4.9 Gt CO 2 -e), and FAL (2.5 Gt CO 2 -e); an industry scenario analysis was conducted and listed low-carbon lists in key industries that meet the dual constraints of carbon and economy. This study can contribute to the rational planning and formulation of climate actions at the technological level to effectively enable deep decarbonization.

Research on Cost-benefit Assessment Methodology for Low Carbon Actions and Application

Low Carbon Society in China: Research and Practice

Assessment on the Possibility of Low-Carbon Economic Development - Taking Zhejiang, China As a Case Study

An Assessment of Low-carbon Economic Development Potential of Zhejiang Province

Carbon Emission Evaluation Model and Carbon Reduction Strategies for Newly Urbanized Areas

Research on the Performance Evaluation Index System Construction and Countermeasure of Low-carbon Economic Development in China

Construction and Application of Low-Carbon Audit Evaluation Index System Based on Low-Carbon Economy

A Carbon Footprint Analysis of the Redevelopment of Former Residential Areas

Evaluation on the Development of International Carbon Accounting Systems

Research on Evaluation Index System of Low-carbon Existing Communities

Research on the decision-making of neighborhood renewal projects based on low-carbon technology

Construction of a Comprehensive Assessment Index System of Low ——Carbon Society Based on Data from Zhejiang

Improving Air Pollution Control Policy in China-A Perspective Based on Cost-Benefit Analysis

Integrated decision-making approach for sectoral low-carbon technology solutions

Strategies for Local Low-Carbon Development

Study on Comprehensive Evaluation of Low-carbon Contribution Effects of Power Supply Enterprises

Using cost–benefit analyses to identify key opportunities in demand-side mitigation

An improved approach for measuring the efficiency of low carbon city practice in China

A low-carbon evaluation framework for regional power systems

Research on Evaluation Index System for Low-carbon Development of China's Automobile Industry

A Review of Building Carbon Emission Accounting Methods under Low-Carbon Building Background