Abstract:Objective To evaluate the effects of baseline and changes of peritoneal transport characteristics on the prognosis of maintaining peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients.Methods Five hundred and eight-six PD patients who started PD from September 11,2006 to October 30,2014 in a single center were included and followed up until March 30,2016.According to their baseline D/Pcr value in peritoneal equilibrium test (PET),the patients were divided into high transport (H) group (D/ Pcr 0.82-1.03),high average transport (HA) group (D/Pcr 0.65-0.81),low average transport (LA) group (D/Pcr 0.50-0.64) and low transport (L) group (D/Pcr 0.34-0.49).According to the changes of follow-up D/Pcr comparing with baseline D/Pcr,the patients were also divided into ascending group,descending group and no-change group.The patient and technical survival rates were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis.Cox proportional hazards analyses were used to analyze the risk factors for PD patient death and technical failure.Results There were 67 patients in L group,229 patients in LA group,252 patients in HA group,and 38 patients in H group.The patient survival rate in H group was significantly lower than those of L group (P=0.036),LA group (P=0.008) and HA group (P=0.041).There was no significant difference on technical survival rate among these 4 groups.According to the tendency of follow-up D/Pcr changes,there were 127 patients in ascending group,101 patients in descending group and 179 patients in no-change group.There was no significant difference on patient survival among these 3 groups (P=0.064).However in patients with a high transport rate (D/Pcr≥0.65),the patient survival was lower in descending group than those in ascending group (P=0.033) and nochange group (P=0.049).Age over 65 years old (HR=2.499),malnutrition during follow-up (HR=3.144),ultrafiltration less than 400 ml/d during follow-up (HR=1.863) and high sensitive C reactive protein≥ 10 mg/L (HR=4.526) were the independent risk factors for patient death (all P ＜ 0.05).Gender (HR=1.609),age over 65 years old (HR=1.929),ultrafiltration less than 400 ml/d during follow-up (HR=1.708),high sensitive C reactive protein ≥10 mg/L (HR=1.829),malnutrition (HR=1.876) and change of peritoneal transport function (HR=0.579) affect technical failure (all P ＜ 0.05).Conclusions The survival rate of PD patients with basal high peritoneal transit is relatively low,especially for patients with descending transport rate during follow-up.The concern on the peritoneal transport status is constructive for the prognosis of PD patients.

A Simple Method for the Estimation of Peritoneal Fluid Transport.

Evaluating peritoneal fluid transport in continuous peritoneal dialysis patients: a practical approach.

Ultrafiltration Capacity and Peritoneal Fluid Kinetics in Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis Patients.

Daily Peritoneal Ultrafiltration Predicts Patient and Technique Survival in Anuric Peritoneal Dialysis Patients.

Impacts of Baseline Peritoneal Transport Characteristics and Their Changes During Follow Up on the Survival of Peritoneal Dialysis Patients

Understand the Difference Between Clinical Measured Ultrafiltrationand Real Ultrafiltration in Peritoneal Dialysis

A Detailed Analysis Of Clinical Measurement Error In Ultrafiltration In Peritoneal Dialysis

Fluid Status of Patients During the Early Stages of Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis

[The effect of increasing ventral movement on the small solutes transport during peritoneal dialysis]

Novel Equations for Estimating Intraperitoneal Pressure among Peritoneal Dialysis Patients

Influence of Peritoneal Rest on the Peritoneal Fluid Transport Function

Effects of Peritoneal Resting on Peritoneal Fluid Transport Kinetics.

[Clinical Characteristics and the Factors Relevant to Peritoneal Transport Function in Patients with Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis].

Predicting solute transfer rate in patients initiating peritoneal dialysis

[Peritoneal Equilibration Test and Results Analysis in Children Undergoing Chronic Peritoneal Dialysis].

Relationship between fill volume and transport in peritoneal dialysis-from bench to bedside

Determining the residual volume in peritoneal dialysis using low molecular weight markers

Prognosis of Peritoneal Dialysis Patients with Different Peritoneal Transport Characteristics: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Evaluation significance of peritoneal dialysis volume calculation based on residual renal function

Gender Impact on Baseline Peritoneal Transport Properties in Incident Peritoneal Dialysis Patients.

Estimating Total Small Solute Clearance in Patients Treated with Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis Without Urine and Dialysate Collection