Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Surgery for Treating Distal Tibial Metaphyseal Fractures

毛海青,杨惠林,徐耀增,杨炎,唐天驷
DOI: https://doi.org/10.19460/j.cnki.0253-3685.2009.02.007
2009-01-01
Abstract:Objective To compare the clinical results of open surgery and minimally invasive surgery in the treatment of distal tibial metaphyseal fractures.Methods Fifty-three cases with distal tibial metaphyseal fractures were treated with open reduction and fixation with plate and screw(group A) or minimally invasive plate(MIPO) osteosynthesis using anatomically pre-shaped locking compression plate(LCP)(group B).The age,sex,AO fracture type,hospital stay,time of fracture union,wound complication,radiographic outcome and ankle function(Lowa score)were compared between the two groups.Results The follow-up period was 9 to 24 months.The hospital stay and the time of fracture union in group A were significantly greater than those in group B(P0.05).The angulation on anteroposterior roentgenogram in group A was less than that in group B during immediate postoperative period(P0.05).The incidence of wound complications and the excellent and good rate of the Lowa score in two groups were similar.There was no significant difference in the radiographic evaluation of fractures union between the two groups.Conclusion The treatment of distal tibial metaphyseal fractures with minimally invasive surgery can reduce the time of hospital stay and fracture union,but the reduction effect of open surgery is better than that of MIPO.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?