Interventional Therapy via the percutaneous Route for Acute Portal Vein Thrombosis

Xiangjie Meng,Guohong Han,Xiangying Feng,Jie Ding,Kaichun Wu,Daiming Fan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1009-4393.2009.17.004
2009-01-01
Abstract:Objective: To evaluate the feasibility, safety and efficacy of transcatheter thrombolytic therapy via the percutaneous transhepatic route or the percutaneous superior mesenteric artery route in 7 patients with acute portal vein thrombosis.Methods: This retrospective study examined six male patients and one female patient with acute portal vein thrombosis (symptoms <40 days) among 72 patients with portal vein thrombosis treated with percutaneous interventional therapy. These seven patients were seen over a period of 8 years. The average age was 43.8 years. The average time from the symptoms’ appearance to being treated was 29.7 days (7.2-47.4 days), and the average time from being in hospital to receiving the percutaneous interventional therapy was 1.7 days (0.5-3.4 days). Patients were treated with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty led using ultrasound Doppler and transcatheter thrombolytic therapy via the transhepatic route, or transcatheter thrombolytic therapy via the femoral artery and superior mesenteric artery route. During treatments, we took down the dosages of thrombolytics (UK or rtPA) and decoagulant (heparin), observed the complications and evaluated the recanalization of portal vein.Results: Local thrombolytic therapies via direct cannulation were performed successfully in seven patients with acute portal vein thrombosis. Among them, three cases were treated via the transhepatic route alone, three cases were treated via the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) route alone, and one case received thrombolytic treatment with UK via the transhepatic route after the previous treatment with rtPA via the SMA route followed by haematoma in inguinal region. The total effective rate was 57.1% (4/7), and the effective rate of the treatment via transhepatic route was 75% (3/4). The incidence rate of complication was 71.4% (5/7). Major complications included haematoma in inguinal region or liver, subcutaneous hemorrhage and nasal hemorrhage. In follow-up, one patient received bowel resection after thrombolytic therapy. Conclusions: Interventional therapy via percutaneous route of acute portal vein thrombosis was feasible, safe and efficient. With the local thrombolysis and anticoagulant therapy, the recanalization rate of acute portal vein thrombosis was quite high. However, there was also a high rate of complications related to hemorrhage. In general, these complications were not severe.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?