Abstract:Background. Variceal esophageal-gastric bleeding is considered to be a life-threatening complication of portal hypertension in patients with cirrhosis. In some cases, only portosystemic shunt can serve as a life-saving intervention for the patient. Aim. To justify the forced expediency of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) in case of ineffective drug and endoscopic hemostasis or a high risk of early recurrence of variceal bleeding. Methods. A single-center observational controlled study was conducted to analyze the results of shunt procedure in 62 patients during the period of 2017–2023. The patients were divided into 2 groups: the main group ( n = 32) with patients who underwent “early” shunt procedure in a “salvage” variant ( n = 10) with continued bleeding and in a “pre-emptive” variant ( n = 22) with a high risk of early recurrence of hemorrhage, and the control group ( n = 30) with patients who underwent planned shunt procedure. The value of the portosystemic pressure gradient was calculated by subtracting the value of the pressure in the inferior vena cava recorded at the initial stage of the operation from the value of the initial pressure in the portal vein, measured by direct manometry. The authors compared the dynamics of the portosystemic pressure gradient in the study groups at similar stages of the intervention — initial, after embolization of the veins of portal blood flow to the varix, after shunt stenting. The study involved the analysis of mortality rates (6-week, one-year, for the entire observation period) and complications. Statistica-for-Windows 12.0 (StatSoft®, USA) and Excel (Microsoft, USA) were used to calculate descriptive statistics. Results. Patients of both groups achieved normalization of pressure in the portal vein system and, accordingly, the portosystemic pressure gradient as a result of shunt surgery. Effective portal decompression was confirmed by their significant reduction. In the portal vein, the pressure decreased from 33.84 ± 2.70 to 20.53 ± 1.27 mmHg ( t = 4.46; p < 0.001) in the main group and from 32.80 ± 3.07 to 20.10 ± 1.60 mmHg ( t = 3.67; p < 0.001) in the control group. The dynamics of the portosystemic pressure gradient showed a significant decrease from 26.16 ± 2.69 to 10.06 ± 0.88 mm Hg ( t = 5.69; p < 0.001) in the main group, and from 24.83 ± 2.73 to 9.67 ± 1.21 mm Hg ( t = 5.08; p < 0.001) in the control group. Together with embolization of the vessels of the hepatofugal inflow of portal blood to the varices, this led to a stable and long-term cessation of variceal bleeding. When comparing the results of shunt procedure in the study groups, no significant differences were found in terms of differentiated mortality rates and complications in both the early and long-term periods. In the main group, the 6-week and one-year mortality rates accounted for 6.3% ( n = 2) and 15.6% ( n = 5), in the control group — 6.7% ( n = 2) and 13.3% ( n = 4), respectively ( p = 0.917). Mortality in the main group comprised 25.0% ( n = 8) over 58 months, in the control group — 23.3% ( n = 7) over 60 months ( p = 0.886). Conclusion. The transjugular shunt provides a significant reduction in the portosystemic pressure gradient. “Salvage” and “pre-emptive” shunt options can prevent death and early recurrence of bleeding. Their effectiveness increases due to endovascular blockage of vessels that ensures the overflow of esophagogastric varices with portal blood.

Endovascular treatment for nonacute symptomatic portal venous thrombosis through intrahepatic portosystemic shunt approach.

[Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt Assisted by Percutaneous Transhepatic Approach for Treatment of Portal Vein Thrombosis].

Clinical efficacy of interventional therapy via TIPS approach for the treatment of acute or subacute portal venous thrombosis

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt combined with dual-access thrombolysis for acute severe non-cirrhotic portal-mesenteric vein thrombosis

Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt for Portal Vein Thrombosis with Symptomatic Portal Hypertension in Liver Cirrhosis

[Clinical Study of Percutaneous Transhepatic Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt].

Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Main Portal Vein Tumor Thrombus-Related Symptomatic Portal Hypertension

Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt for Palliative Treatment of Portal Hypertension Secondary to Portal Vein Tumor Thrombosis

Exploration of interventional therapy strategy for portal vein occlusion: a case series study

[Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt and Combination with Percutaneous Transhepatic or Transsplenic Approach for the Treatment of Portal Vein Thrombosis with or Without Cavernomatous Transformation].

Interventional radiological technique for acute and subacute portal vein and superior mesenteric vein thrombosis

Use of concomitant variceal embolization and prophylactic antiplatelet/anticoagulative in transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunting: A retrospective study of 182 cirrhotic portal hypertension patients.

The Use of Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt Should Be Cautious in Patients Without Cirrhosis with Obliterative Portal Vein Thrombosis

Interventional combined with surgical therapy of 7 cases of portal venous thrombosis

Portosystemic shunt for variceal esophagogastric bleeding and risk of early re-bleeding. Rationale for involuntary intervention: A single-center observational controlled study

Comparison of Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt in the Treatment of Cirrhosis With or Without Portal Vein Thrombosis: A Retrospective Study

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt is effective in patients with chronic portal vein thrombosis and variceal bleeding

Effect of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt in treatment of chronic portal vein thrombosis with esophageal variceal bleeding

The Preferable Treatment for Cirrhotic Portal Vein Thrombosis: Anticoagulation or Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt?

Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunts: Midterm Results in 28 Patients.

Interventional Therapy via the percutaneous Route for Acute Portal Vein Thrombosis