Clinical Outcomes of Deferent Fusion Methods for Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis

CHEN Zhu,KANG Yi-jun,KONG Jin-hai
2009-01-01
Abstract:To compare the clinical outcomes of posterior lumber interbody fusion(PLIF),posterolateral lumbar fusion(PLF) and PLIF associated with PLF(PLIF+PLF) for degenerative lumbar spondylolithesis.59 patients were divided into three groups by the style of fusion.The three groups were compared for operating time,blood loss,fusion rate,disc space height,slipping angle and the rate of the improved JOA score(RIS).The fusion rate of PLIF or PLIF+PLF was higher than PLF(P<0.05).PLIF+PLF had more operating time and blood loss than PLIF or PLF(P<0.05).PLF were worse than PLIF or PLIF+PLF for the disc space height and the slipping angle(P<0.05).No statistical differences were found for the rate of the improved JOA score(RIS) of the three groups(P>0.05).Therefore,PLIF and PLF were both valid bone graft methods for degenerative lumbar spondylolithesis.The fusion rate of PLIF and PLIF+PLF were higher than PLF.Generally,PLIF was better than PLF or PLIF+PLF for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?