Abstract:Purpose: Single-isocenter linear accelerator (LINAC)-based stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has become a promising treatment technique for the management of multiple brain metastases. Because of the high prescription dose and steep dose gradient, SRS plans are sensitive to geometric errors, resulting in loss of target coverage and suboptimal local tumor control. Current planning techniques rely on adding a uniform and isotropic setup margin to all gross tumor volumes (GTVs) to account for rotational uncertainties. However, this setup margin may be insufficient, since the magnitude of rotational uncertainties varies and is dependent upon the distance between a GTV and the isocenter. In this study, we designed a framework to determine the optimal isocenter of a single-isocenter SRS plan for multiple brain metastases using stochastic optimization to mitigate potential errors resulting from rotational uncertainties. Methods: Planning target volumes (PTVs), defined as GTVs plus a 1-mm margin following common SRS planning convention, were assumed to be originally treated with a prescription dose and therefore covered by the prescription isodose cloud. The dose distribution, including the prescription isodose, was considered invariant assuming small rotations throughout the study. A stochastic optimization scheme was developed to determine the location of the optimal isocenter, so that the prescription dose coverage of rotated GTVs, equivalent to the intersecting volumes between the rotated GTVs and original PTVs, was maximized for any random small rotations about the isocenter. To evaluate the coverage of GTVs, the expected V 100 % undergoing random rotations was approximated as the sample average V 100 % undergoing a predetermined number of rotations. The expected V 100 % of each individual GTV and total GTVs was then compared between the plans using the optimal isocenter and the center-of-mass (CoM), respectively. Results: Twenty-two patients previously treated for multiple brain metastases in a single institute were included in this retrospective study. Each patient was initially treated for more than three brain metastases (mean: 7.6; range: 3-15) with the average GTV volume of 0.89 cc (range: 0.03-11.78 cc). The optimal isocenter found for each patient was significantly different from the CoM, with the average Euclidean distance between the optimal isocenter and the CoM being 4.36 ± 2.59 cm. The dose coverage to GTVs was also significantly improved (paired t-test; p < 0.001) when the optimal isocenter was used, with the average V 100 % of total GTVs increasing from 87.1% (standard deviation as std: 11.7%; range: 39.9-98.2%) to 94.2% (std: 5.4%; range: 77.7-99.4%). The volume of a GTV was positively correlated with the expected V 100 % regardless of the isocenter used (Spearman coefficient: ρ = 0.66 ; p < 0.001). The distance between a GTV and the isocenter was negatively correlated with the expected V 100 % when the CoM was used ( ρ = - 0.21 ; p = 0.004), however no significant correlation was found when the optimal isocenter was used ( ρ = - 0.11 ; p = 0.137). Conclusion: The proposed framework provides an effective approach to determine the optimal isocenter of single-isocenter LINAC-based SRS plans for multiple brain metastases. The implementation of the optimal isocenter results in SRS plans with consistently higher target coverage despite potential rotational uncertainties, and therefore significantly improves SRS plan robustness against random rotational uncertainties.

Clinical Treatment Planning Optimization by Powell'S Method for Gamma Unit Treatment System

Three-dimensional Optimization of Treatment Planning for Gamma Unit Treatment System.

Optimizing Computerized Treatment Planning for the Gamma Knife by Source Culling.

Treatment Planning Optimization by Quasi-Newton and Simulated Annealing Methods for Gamma Unit Treatment System

The Study and Implementation of Dose Calculation Method in OUR-Body Gamma Knife

Guaranteed epsilon-optimal treatment plans with minimum number of beams for stereotactic body radiation therapy

An Optimization Algorithm For Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy - The Simulated Dynamics With Dose-Volume Constraints

Treatment Planning Methods for Dose Painting by Numbers Treatment in Gamma Knife Radiosurgery

[Optimization Methods in Radiation Treatment Planning].

A Randomized Singular Value Decomposition Based Linear Programming Technique for Robotic Radiation Therapy Treatment Plan Optimization

A Two-Stage Sequential Linear Programming Approach to Imrt Dose Optimization

SU‐E‐T‐175: Clinical Evaluations of Monte Carlo‐Based Inverse Treatment Plan Optimization for Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy

Biological optimization for hybrid proton-photon radiotherapy

Multi-objective optimization in radiotherapy: applications to stereotactic radiosurgery and prostate brachytherapy

An Inverse Dose Optimization Algorithm for Three-Dimensional Brachytherapy

Estimation theory and model parameter selection for therapeutic treatment plan optimization

MO-D-351-05: A “slicing” Approach for IMRT Optimization Using Linear Programming

Optimization of treatment isocenter location in single-isocenter LINAC-based stereotactic radiosurgery for management of multiple brain metastases

Dosimetric Impact of Optimization Resolutions Using the New Photon Optimizer Algorithm in Eclipse Treatment Planning System

An Efficient Method for Improving the Dose-Volume-Based Optimization Plan Quality

Direct optimization of dose-volume histogram metrics in radiation therapy treatment planning