Abstract:There are at least three foundational relationships between the three conscious acts of intellect, emotion, and willing. Section 2 covers the structural foundational relationship (Brentano and Husserl in his early period): all conscious acts are intentional and can be divided into objectifying (intuition and representation) and non-objectifying acts (emotion and willing). Because a non-objectifying act cannot constitute an object, things must be based on objectifying acts and the object constituted by the latter; in this sense, a non-objectifying act is rooted in an objectifying one. Section 3 explains the genetic foundational issue with consciousness (Husserl in his later period, Scheler, and Heidegger): the stream of consciousness has its earliest origins and follows a process where it gradually unfolds. The earliest origin is the intentional willing, followed by nonintentional feelings, and, finally, the representation and thinking of willing. Intentional activity taking place afterward must be based on the conscious activity that has come already. Section 4 points out that, apart from the two aforementioned kinds of foundational relationships (i.e. structural and genetic), a third foundational relationship (i.e. dynamic) can also be found between the conscious acts of intellect, emotion, and willing in the Consciousness-only school (a Buddhist tradition in the East). In a continuous activity, the foundational relationship between the three aspects of intellect, emotion, and willing always remains encased in dynamic changes, and the change of primary and secondary roles (i.e. a change in the foundational relationship) could happen at any time. From this perspective, one can explain and resolve the confrontation and conflicts between the two former foundational relationships.

Transcending Empiricism and Rationalism : From Intentionality to Intercorporeity——Evolution of the Phenomenological Epistemology

Longitudinal-Intentionality:Time, Genesis, History——Husserl’s Understanding of their Immanent Relationship

Neurophenomenology and Its Problems

Origins of Intentionality: Identity, Self-creativity and Meaning

Discussion about the Triple Foundational Relationship between Intellect, Emotion, and Willing from the Perspective of the Phenomenology of Consciousness

Theodor Lipps and Edmund Husserl in the Early Phenomenological Movement: From Empathy Psychology to Einfühlung Phenomenology

Entwinement Between Phenomenology and Psychology-Reviewing and Reexamining the Relations Between Husserl and Brentano at the Level of Thoughts

Phenomenology in Relation with Anthropology and Psychology Concerning Methodology

Intentionality: Phenomenology and Analytic Philosophy (Symposium)

Solipsistic and Symbiotic: Intersubjective Idea of Neo-phenomenology

On Husserl's Transcendental Phenomenology and the Western Traditional Subjectivism

From Husserl to Merleau-Ponty: Tracing the Arc of Phenomenology

From Experience to Body Experience:Trend of Radical Empiricism of Modern Western Philosophy

Intentionality and Autonomy in Husserl’s Phenomenology: A Comprehensive Analysis of Conscious Decisions and the Transcendental Ego

Reduction and Construction——Interpreting The Idea of Phenomenology

Localization of Knowledge is Perceived from the Development of Phenomenology

From the “Logic of Illusion” to “the Logic of Phenomenology”

Peirce' Phenomenology and Its Significance:Peirce Transcending Nietzsche

Introspection and First-Person Perspective

Exploring Ego:From the Consciousness of Self to the Emergence of Personality

Compatibility and Tensions Between Transcendental Idealism and Common-Sense Realism — Husserl and McDowell