Criticism and Improvement on Lex Loci Conditionis in Conflict Rules of Unjust Enrichment

蒋奋,金彭年
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1009-1505.2010.05.002
2010-01-01
Abstract:Pure Lex Loci Conditionis refers to the locus where unjust enrichment takes place as the sole connecting factor in space for the bilateral conflict.As far as the history of legislation is concerned,it is an old-fashioned legislative mainstream;as for model of legislation,Pure Lex Loci Conditionis is categorized as traditional conflict rule carrying with itself some defects like rigidness and closedness which need to be softened by Lex Patriae Debitoris,Lex Fori and Lex Causa Condictionis.In the case of its meaning,the interpretation of "the place where unjust enrichment takes place" is not precise,as its directional connection can be understood as the place place where the loss occurs,the place of enrichment and the place where the cause factor occurs.And the place where the cause factor occurs should be prevailing.Since there is no conflict rule of unjust enrichment in P.R.C.,the meaning of the place where unjust takes place must be made clear.Lex Loci Conditionis can be adopted in China's legislation after its connection has been softened.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?