Abstract:OBJECTIVE:To develop and evaluate scaling and scoring assumptions, and the reliability and the validity of a Chinese version of the SF-36 scales.METHODS:A multi-stage mixed sampling procedure was used to select a representative sample of the general population. The sample size was 1 000 households. All family members of a selected household, aged 18 and older, completed a survey by self-administration. Formal psychometric methods for testing assumptions underlying item scoring and scale construction were used according to the standard procedure of the IQOLA Project.RESULTS:Of the 1 985 collected questionnaires, 1 972 were qualified. Of them, 1 688 (85.6%) were respondents. 1 316 respondents answered all 36 items, while the remaining (372 respondents) answered with one or several missing responses. Among the non-respondents, 65.5% were illiteracy or quasi-illiteracy. The assumption of equal intervals was violated for the VT and MH scales. The recoded item values were used to calculate scale scores. The clustering and ordering of the item means were approximately the same as that of the source version and other two Chinese versions. The items in each scale had similar standard deviations except those in the PF, BP, SF scales. The correlations between an item and its hypothesized scale were identical for all except the SF and VT scales. The scaling success rates of convergent validity were 0% for the SF scale, 75% for the VT scale, and 100% for the other six scales. The scaling success rates of discriminat validity ranged from 87.5% to 100% for all scales except for the SF scale. The Cronbach' alpha coefficients of internal consistency reliability ranged from 0.72 to 0.88, which were satisfactory for group comparison except 0.39 for the SF scale and 0.66 for the VT scale. The two-weeks test-retest reliability coefficient ranged from 0.66 to 0.94. Factor analysis identified two principal components: a "physical" factor and a "mental" factor. Taken together, these two factors could be used to explain 56.3% of the total variance.CONCLUSION:The Chinese version of the SF-36 Health Survey Scale has achieved conceptual equivalence and satisfied the psychometric scaling assumptions well enough to warrant wide use in China. Known-groups validity will give more meaningful evidences of the validity of the Chinese SF-36 scales.

Reliability and Validity Analysis of Chinese Version of SUPPH in Patients with Lung Cancer

[Reliability and Validity of a Short-Form Health Survey Scale (SF-36), Chinese Version Used in an Elderly Population of Zhejiang Province in China].

Testing Measurement Invariance of the Chinese Version of the Strategies Used by Patients to Promote Health among Patients with Cancer.

Factorial structure of a scale: Strategies Used by People to Promote Health--Chinese version

Reliability and Validity of Self-made Life Quality Questionnaire of Lung Cancer patients

Analysis of Reliability and Validity of the Supportive Care Needs Questionnaire in Chinese Patients with Prostate Cancer

Reliability and Validity of Chinese version Cancer Rehabilitation Evaluation System-Short Form

Reliability and Validity of an Instrument to Assess Pediatric Inpatients' Experience of Care in China.

Validity and reliability of the Chinese version of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System adult profile-57 (PROMIS-57)

Validation of COPD Population Screener Questionnaire in Chinese Population: A National Multicenter Study

[Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of the 5-Item Oral Health Impact Profile].

Development and Psychometric Tests of a Chinese Version of the SF-36 Health Survey Scales.

Translation, Validity, and Reliability of the Chinese Version of the Breast Cancer Survivor Self-efficacy Scale in China.

The Validation and Reliability of the Chinese Version of the Speech Handicap Index for Patients with Oral and Oropharyngeal Cancer.

Simplified Chinese version of the PROMIS Pediatric-25 profile: A validation study among cancer children

Validation of a Chinese version of the short-form Cataldo lung cancer stigma scale

Translation and validation of the Chinese version of Palliative Care Self-Efficacy Scale

Reliability and Validity Verification of the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite 26-Item Version in Chinese

Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the Chronic Heart Failure Health-related Quality of Life Questionnaire (CHFQOLQ-20)

Reliability and Validity Assessment of Chinese Hospital Patient Experience and Satisfaction Monitoring Scale

Analysis of Known-group Validity of Pediatric Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System