Abstract:Investors are unable to fully receive information from listed firms due to limited cognitive resources.In reality, inves-tors tend to rely on few third-party information intermediaries, e.g.media press, to obtain information of listed firms.With the development of internet technology, listed firms adopt the strategy to proactively manage their information channels and public news sentiment in order to maintain a good information environment.This paper tries to answer the question of how much firms′internet media management behavior contributes to positive market consequences(improvement in stock liquidity). Using a unique survey conducted by Shenzhen Stock Exchange and other three market regulatory institutions, we construct a measure of firms′internet media management level using cluster and principal component analysis, and empirically examine the influence of internet media management on stock liquidity, which is a direct measure of information asymmetry. We find that ①high intensity of internet media management improves stock liquidity, and that ②our main result holds mainly for firms that are less visible with weak information environment.Further analysis shows that when firms encounter bad news or neg-ative media sentiment, internet media management helps improve stock liquidity more.Moreover, internet media management in-creases stock idiosyncratic volatility and decreases stock return synchronicity, providing additional empirical evidences that internet media management reduces information asymmetry and increases firm-specific information contained in stock prices.Our results are robust after sample matching, controlling the problems of simultaneity and alternative explanations for independent variable. The results indicate that internet media management reduces investors′information processing cost and bias, hence reduces the level of information asymmetry, which is similar to the effects of information disclosure.The main contributions of this paper are as follows.Firstly, this paper adds to the information disclosure literature by providing evidence that internet media manage-ment reduces the level of information asymmetry.Secondly, prior literatures usually study the consequences of passive media cov-erage.This paper is one of the pioneer papers focusing on proactive internet media management, providing new perspective on media coverage research.Thirdly, the conclusion of this paper provides empirical support and guiding significance for regulators building a regulation system with information disclosure as its core center, and practical significance for practitioners on proactive media and firm liquidity management.

The Role of the Media in the Internet IPO Bubble (Forthcoming: Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis)

The Role of the Media in the Internet IPO Bubble

The Role of the Media in the Launch of Internet IPOs

The Role of Bad-News Coverage and Media Environments in Crash Risk Around the World

The Long-Run Role of the Media: Evidence from Initial Public Offerings

Media Reports and IPO Performance:Information Asymmetry or Investor Sentiment——A Study Based on the Listed Companies in ChiNext

Social Media Emotions and IPO Returns

The Influence of the Media on Government Decisions: Evidence from IPOs in China

Microblog publicity and IPO underpricing

The Rise and Fall of Internet Stocks: Should Finanical Analysts be Blamed?

Media Coverage,Investor Sentiment and IPO Under-performance——-Evidence from ChiNest

Internet Media Management and Stock Liquidity

Information Disclosure and Adverse Selection Explanations for IPO Underpricing

Underwriter manipulation in initial public offerings

COVID-19 Media Sentiment and IPO Underpricing

Building Castles in the Air: Evidence from Industry IPO Waves

Torpedo Your Competition: Strategic Reporting and Peer Firm IPO

Ambiguous Signals and Information Asymmetry in the Initial Public Offering Process: Examining Ownership Concentration, Process Time, and Underpricing

Media Tone and Stock Price Crash Risk: Evidence from China

Study on IPO's underpricing and overpricing in China: Evidence from Chinese listed companies