Abstract:Purpose This paper aims to study the underpricing phenomenon of initial public offerings (IPOs) of 355 Indian companies issued from 2007 to 2019. The research question this paper empirically examines is whether Indian corporate executives deliberately underprice IPOs from its fair value to attract investors, thereby causing an abnormal spike in the prices on the listing day. The findings of this study challenge a commonly held notion of leaving money on the table by IPO issuing companies. Of the overall average listing day returns of 17%, the deliberate premarket underpricing component is found to be mere 5.3%, while the remaining price fluctuation is, inter alia, a result of market momentum along with the unmet demands of impatient investors. Design/methodology/approach Following Koop and Li (2001), this study uses Stochastic frontier model (SFM) to study a routine anomaly of disparity between the primary market price (i.e. IPO issue price) and the secondary market price (listing price). The jump in the issue price observed on a listing day is decomposed into deliberate premarket underpricing component that reflects the extent of managerial manipulation and the after-market misvaluation component attributable to information asymmetry and prevailing market volatility. Findings This paper uses SFM to bifurcate initial returns into deliberate underpricing by managers and after-market mispricing by noise traders. This study finds that a significant part of the initial return is explained through after-market mispricing. This study finds that average initial returns are 17%, deliberate premarket underpricing is 5.3% and after-market mispricing averages 11.9%. Research limitations/implications This study can isolate underpricing done at the premarket by estimating a systematic one-sided error term that measures the maximum predicted issue price deviation from the offered price. Consequentially, the disaggregation of initial returns may be especially informative for retail investors in planning their exit strategy from an IPO by separating the strength of the firm's fundamentals and its causal relationship with the initial returns. Substantial proportion of after-market mispricing implies that future research should focus on factors causing after-market mispricing. As underlying causes are identified, tailor-made policy responses can be formulated to benefit investors. Practical implications This paper has empirically validated that initial return is a mix of both components, i.e. deliberate underpricing and aftermarket mispricing. This disaggregation of initial returns can prove helpful for investors in planning their exit strategy. This study can help investors to become more aware of the importance of the fundamentals of the firm and its causal relation with the initial returns. This information in turn can help reduce the information asymmetry amongst investors and help them lessen the costs of adverse selection. Originality/value A large number of research studies on IPO pricing find overwhelming evidence of underpricing in public issues. This research attempts to decompose the extent of underpricing into deliberate underpricing and after-market mispricing, thereby supplementing the existing literature on the IPO pricing puzzle. To the best of the authors' knowledge, this study is the first contribution to the literature on initial return decomposition for the Indian capital markets.

Underwriter manipulation in initial public offerings

Do Private Equity Investors Conspire with Ultimate Owners in the IPO Process?

IPO Offer Price Regulation, Financial Reporting Quality, and IPO Overpricing

Manipulation in Case of No Limitation on IPO Allocation

Deliberate underpricing and after-market mispricing in Indian IPO market: Stochastic frontier approach

Market Manipulation Rules and IPO Underpricing

Limited Attention, Legalized Bribery and the Initial Public Offering Process

Rent Seeking, Brokerage Commissions, and Pricing and Share Allocation in Initial Public Offerings

Underwriter reputation and IPO underpricing: The role of institutional investors in the Chinese growth enterprise market

The JOBS Act and IPO underpricing

IPO Underpricing and Limited Attention: Theory and Evidence

Underwriter,Cooperation Relationship and IPO Underpricing: Analysis from Multiple Agency Theory

Who Do You Take to Tango? Examining Pairing Mechanisms Between Underwriters and Initial Public Offering Firms in a Nascent Stock Market

Ambiguous Signals and Information Asymmetry in the Initial Public Offering Process: Examining Ownership Concentration, Process Time, and Underpricing

Reputation and Opportunism in the Process of IPO Under-Pricing

Tunneling As an Incentive for Earnings Management During the IPO Process in China

Analysts' Strategic Distortion During Ipo Waves

Institutional Investors’ Cognitive Constraints During Initial Public Offerings

Building Castles in the Air: Evidence from Industry IPO Waves

Information Disclosure and Adverse Selection Explanations for IPO Underpricing

The Efficient IPO Market Hypothesis: Theory and Evidence