Abstract:Suitable compatibilizers are essential to prepare immiscible polymer blends with stable co‐continuous morphologies. From the thermodynamic point of view, such compatibilizer should not only reduce the interfacial tension, but also promote the formation of flat interface between different phases. Meanwhile, it must not hinder the coalescence of dispersed phase. Therefore, asymmetric structures are required for those block or graft copolymer compatibilizers. However, from the kinetic point of view, copolymers with asymmetric structures are prone to be dragged out from the interface and form micelles in one phase under the processing conditions, which will lose their compatibilization effects. The balance between such thermodynamic and kinetic factors remains unclear. In this paper, the relationship between the morphology of the compatibilized polystyrene/nylon 6/styrene‐maleic anhydride copolymers (PS/PA6/SMA) immiscible polymer blends and the structures of the in‐situ formed SMA‐g‐PA6 graft copolymers as well as the processing conditions are studied. Two kinds of SMA are used as compatibilizers: SMA28 (Mw = 110,000 g/mol, MAH content 28 wt.%) and SMA11 (Mw = 110,000 g/mol, MAH content 11 wt.%). After melt blending with PA6 into an internal mixer, the in‐situ formed copolymer SMA28‐g‐PA6 has an average four PA6 side chains grafted on one SMA backbone, while that of SMA11‐g‐PA6 has only one PA6 side chain. Dissipative particle dynamics (DPD) simulation results indicate that both SMA28‐g‐PA6 copolymer and PS/PA6/SMA28 blends tend to form co‐continuous structure, while SMA11‐g‐PA6 copolymer and PS/PA6/SMA11 blends form sea‐island morphologies. However, these results are confirmed experimentally only at relatively low rotor speed of the internal mixer (60 rpm). When the rotor speed of the mixer is higher (105 rpm), sea‐island morphologies are obtained in PS/PA6/SMA28 blends and co‐continuous ones are found in PS/PA6/SMA11 systems. These results indicate that higher shear stress will favor to elongate the minor phase domains and form flat interfaces, which is benefit for the formation of co‐continuous morphologies; meanwhile, high shear stress may pull the graft copolymers with asymmetric structures (SMA28‐g‐PA6) out from the interface of PS and PA6 and induce the formation of sea island morphologies. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved

Instability of Graft Copolymers under Polymer Blending Conditions

A Dissipative Particle Dynamics Study on the Compatibilizing Process of Immiscible Polymer Blends with Graft Copolymers

Compatibilizing Efficiency of Copolymer Precursors for Immiscible Polymer Blends

Rheological Properties of PET/PA66/Liquid Crystalline Copolyesteramide Blends

Efficiency of Graft Copolymers at Stabilizing Co-Continuous Polymer Blends During Quiescent Annealing

Blend Composition Dependence of the Compatibilizing Efficiency of Graft Copolymers for Immiscible Polymer Blends

THE STUDY OF APPLIED BEHAVIOR OF PP/PA6 BY USING GRAFTED POLYPROPYLENE AS COMPATILIZER

Morphology, thermal behavior, and mechanical properties of nylon6/multi-monomer grafted polypropylene blends

CRYSTALLIZATION BEHAVIORS OF GLYCIDYL METHACRYLATE/STYRENE MULTI-MONOMER GRAFTED POLYPROPYLENE AND POLYAMIDE 6 BLENDS

Relationship Between The Co‐Continuous Morphology of Immiscible Polymer Blends and the Structure of An In Situ Formed Graft Copolymer

Thermal, mechanical, and morphological studies of a depolymerizable graft copolymer thermoplastic

Phase Separation in Blends of Homopolymer and Graft Copolymer Based on Styrene and Butadiene

Morphology Evolution of Miscible Blends Between Crystalline Pa6 and Amorphous Pa6icot

Crystallization and Performance of Polyamide Blends Comprising Polyamide 4, Polyamide 6, and Their Copolymers

Structure, Morphology and Properties of a Novel Molecular Composite by In‐Situ Blending of Anionic Polyamide 6 with a Polyamide Copolymer Containing Rigid Segments

Efficiency of Graft Copolymers As Compatibilizers for Immiscible Polymer Blends

Fracture Mechanism Change at a Heterogeneous Polymer-Polymer Interface Reinforced with in Situ Graft Copolymers

Influence of Preparation Methods on the Structures and Properties for the Blends Between Polyamide 6co6t and Polyamide 6: Melt‐mixing and In‐situ Blending

The Preparation of Monomer Casting Polyamide 6/Thermotropic Liquid Crystalline Polymer Composite Materials with Satisfactory Miscibility

Control of Phase Morphology of Binary Polymer Grafted Nanoparticle Blend Films via Direct Immersion Annealing

Molecular dynamics simulation and non-isothermal crystallization kinetics of polyamide 4 and different bio-based polyamide blends