Abstract:It is demonstrated that cuprous oxide (Cu2O) can be electrodeposited epitaxially onto silicon (Si) and indium phosphide (InP) (001) single‐crystalline substrates from aqueous solution. Epitaxial electrodeposition under these conditions is remarkable considering the strong driving force for the formation of amorphous native oxide layers on Si and InP substrates. To elucidate the growth mechanisms, the microstructure of the interfaces between the Cu2O layer and the two different substrates was investigated by TEM (transmission electron microscopy) in conjunction with XEDS (X‐ray energy‐dispersive spectroscopy) and EELS (electron energy‐loss spectroscopy). In both heteroepitaxial systems, the Cu2O layers have a unique but non‐trivial crystallographic orientation relationship (OR) with the substrate, which can be described as a 45° rotation around the common [001] axis representing the substrate normal. We show that this relationship minimizes the overall misfit between corresponding interatomic spacings of the two adjacent crystals. In apparent contradiction to the unique OR, TEM revealed that in both hetero‐systems the Cu2O layer is separated from the substrate by an amorphous interlayer. The thickness of the interlayer typically is a few nanometers. The presence of an amorphous interlayer contrasts with our experimental results on electrodeposited Cu2O on Au (001) single‐crystal substrates, also included in this article, where TEM shows the Cu2O epilayer in direct contact with the substrate. XEDS and EELS analysis of the chemical composition and bonding at Cu2O/Si and Cu2O/InP interfaces in the as‐grown state as well as after tempering revealed that the interlayer is mainly composed of SiO2 and InPO4, respectively. Most likely, the observed epitaxial layers on top of an amorphous interlayer evolve by nucleation of epitaxial Cu2O directly on the substrate. While simultaneous oxidation of the substrate leads to the formation of an amorphous layer, the epitaxial nuclei can laterally overgrow the oxide. Consequently, the local composition of the amorphous layer varies with the nature of the substrate.

Epitaxial growth of Fe3O4 (111) on SrTiO3 (001) substrates

Epitaxial growth of Fe3O4 (1 1 1) on SrTiO3 (0 0 1) substrates

Epitaxy of Fe3O4 on Si(001) by pulsed laser deposition using a TiN/MgO buffer layer

Epitaxial Growth and Interface of (111)-Oriented Spinel Li0.5Fe2.5O4 Film on SrTiO3(001) Substrate

Epitaxial growth and interface of (1 1 1)-oriented spinel Li0.5Fe2.5O4 film on SrTiO3(0 0 1) substrate

Engineering Oxide Epitaxy beyond Substrate Constraint

Molecular Beam Epitaxy Growth of Tetragonal FeS Films on SrTiO3 (001) Substrates

Single Crystalline Highly Epitaxial Pt Thin Films On (001) Srtio3

Effect of interface on epitaxy and magnetism in h-RFeO3/Fe3O4/Al2O3 films (R=Lu, Yb)

EPITAXIAL GROWTH OF CUPROUS OXIDE ELECTRODEPOSITED ONTO SEMICONDUCTOR AND METAL SUBSTRATES

Epitaxial Electrodeposition of a Crystalline Metal Oxide onto Single-Crystalline Silicon

Epitaxil Electrodeposition Of A Crystalline Metal Oxide Onto Single-Crystalline Silicon

Interfacial Reaction in the Growth of Epitaxial Srtio3 Thin Films on (001) Si Substrates

Growth of Srtio3(110) Film by Oxide Molecular Beam Epitaxy with Feedback Control

Epitaxial Growth and Atomic Arrangement in Fe2CrO4 on Crystal Symmetry Matched (001) MgAl2O4

Epitaxial L10 FePt films on SrTiO3 (1 0 0) by sputtering

Epitaxial L10 FePt Films on SrTiO3 (100) by Sputtering

Realization of high-quality Sr4Fe6O13 epitaxial film and its phase competition with SrFeO2.5

High-Index Epitaxial Fe Films Grown on MgO(113)

Hydrothermal Growth and Orientation of LaFeO3 Epitaxial Films

Interface Structure and Phase of Epitaxial SrTiO3 (110) Thin Films Grown Directly on Silicon