Abstract:Models of spatial relations are a key component of geographical information science (GIS). Efforts have been made to formally define spatial relations. The foundation model for such a formal presentation is the 4-intersection model proposed by Egenhofer and Franzosa (1991). In this model, the topological relations between two simple spatial entities A and B are transformed into point-set topology problems in terms of the intersections of A's interior and boundary with B's interior and boundary. Later, Egenhofer and Herring (1991) extended this model to 9-intersection by addition of another element, i.e. the exterior of an entity, which is then defined as its complement. However, the use of its complement as the exterior of an entity causes the linear dependency between its interior, boundary and exterior. Thus such an extension from 4- to 9-intersection should be of no help in terms of the number of relations. This can be confirmed by the discovery of Egenhofer et al. (1993). The distinction of additional relations in the case where the co-dimension is not zero is purely due to the adoption of definitions of the interior, boundary and exterior of entities in a lower dimensional to a higher dimension of space, e.g. lines in 1-dimensional space to 2-dimensional space. With such adoption, the topological convention that the boundary of a spatial entity separates its interior from its exterior is violated. It is such a change of conventional topological properties that causes the linear dependency between these three elements of a spatial entity (i.e. the interior, boundary and exterior) to disappear, thus making the distinction of additional relations possible in such a case (i.e. the co-dimension is not zero).It has been discussed that the use of Voronoi-regions of an entity to replace its complement as its exterior in the 9-intersection model would solve the problem (i.e. violation of topological convention) or would make this model become more comprehensive. Therefore, a Voronoi-based 9-intersection model is proposed. In addition to the improvement in the theoretical aspect, the Voronoi-based 9-intersection model (V9I) can also distinguish additional relations which are beyond topological relations, such as high-resolution disjoint relations and relations of complex spatial entities. However, high-resolution disjoint relations defined by this model are not purely topological. In fact, it is a mixture of topology and metric.

Topological Relations Between Vague Objects in Discrete Space Based on Rough Model.

Representaion of Topological Relations between Vague Objects Based on Rough and RCC Model

Study of topological relations between vague regions in discrete space based on rough sets

A new model for topological relations between convex regions.

Fuzzy RCC8 Topological Relations

Rough Spatial Interpretation

Description of combined spatial relations between broad boundary regions based on rough set

Spatial Orientational Relations Rough Reasoning

Reasoning about topological relations between regions with broad boundaries

Fuzzy description of topological relations II: computation methods and examples

A Refined Lines/Regions and Lines/Lines Topological Relations Model Based on Whole-Whole Objects Intersection Components

Deriving Topological Relations Between Uncertain Regions from Direction Relations

Fuzzy description of topological relations I: a unified fuzzy 9-intersection model

Voronoi-based 9-Intersection Model for Topological Spatial Relations

A Voronoi-Based 9-Intersection Model For Spatial Relations

An Unified CGA-Based Formal Expression of Spatio-Temporal Topological Relations for Computation and Analysis of Geographic Objects

Fuzzy topological relations between fuzzy spatial objects

Quasi-atomic relations based rough set model and convex geometry

Geometric Lattice Structure of Covering-Based Rough Sets Through Matroids

Modeling The Vagueness Of Areal Geographic Objects: A Categorization System

Topological Characterizations for Three Covering Approximation Operators