Abstract:In order to achieve a fair, probity, transparent and open competition environment in the construction industry, the Chinese government has developed and applied a multi-criteria competitive tendering system for the procurement of construction projects. However in many cases, the system only works on compilation of requirements and problems still frequently occur. The aim of this paper is to review the current construction tendering system and practice and propose strategies for improvement. A number of methods have been used to obtain research data, including focused group workshops and discussions, on-site observations, desk top study of relevant regulations and policies and review of three actual project tendering cases. It was found that China has gone a long way from project assignment to the current competitive tendering practice. However, the current tendering system has prevented bidders from focussing on value for money and construction innovation. Furthermore, the tender evaluation processes were rather formal and compilation of procedures and requirements than in-depth and project-specific. In addition, the time (half a day) given for evaluating tender submissions was insufficient. In some cases, the tender evaluation criteria was set after the bidders had been selected and there was no mechanism in place to review or audit the contract award decisions made by the tender evaluation committees. Based on these findings, it is suggested that as part of the market economic system, the Chinese government should allow bidders to calculate project cost on the basis of market price information and the company’s technical and management capabilities, instead of following quotation books and regulations and guidelines issued by the government. It is also suggested that detailed evaluation criteria be prepared prior to calling for tender and more time be given to evaluate tender submission documents. Finally, it is suggested that random audit of archived cases be conducted to ensure the decisions made were fair, open and probity.

Reasons Underlying a Mandatory High Penalty Construction Contract Bonding System

Transparency in the Procurement of Public Works

The Effect Of Engineering Surety Bondupon The Method Of Wining The Bid At The Lowest Price

Default Behaviors of Contractors under Surety Bond in Construction Industry Based on Evolutionary Game Model

Data-driven assessment on the corporate credit scoring mechanism for Chinese construction supervision companies

Re-Surety System As a Governance Innovation in China's Specialized Construction Contract Bond Market

Marketization Vs. Market Chase: Insights from Implicit Government Guarantees

The Warrantor and Recognizance System for Administrative Penalty for Public Security

Supplier selection and contract enforcement: Evidence from performance bonding

The Uncared-for History of Bonds Institutional——Legal Bottleneck with China(Company) Bond Market

Institution Economics Analysis of the Chinese Local Government Bond

Conceptual Proposal and Modeling of a Construction Surety Reinsurance Company with a Quasi-Public Function: Empirical Evidence from China

The Public Private Partnership In Expressway Construction

Not All Bonds Are Created Equal-As Benchmarks for Corporate Bonds

Study on incentive contract mechanism of construction project under bilateral moral hazard

A Concept of Local Bonds Financing System under the Supervision by Central Government

A Research on the Causes of Credit Risk of Urban Construction Investment Bond in China

Incentives for Promoting Safety in the Chinese Construction Industry

A Comparative Study on the Operation Modes of Peasant Worker Bond

The Situation of Property Penalty Executing and Countermeasure

An Overview of China’s Construction Project Tendering