Interference for Various Quench Agents of Chemical Disinfectants on Detection of Endotoxin Activities in Water
Can Zhang,Wen-jun Liu,Yun Shi,Dai-zhi An,Miao Bai,Wen Xu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13227/j.hjkx.2015.05.022
2015-01-01
Abstract:The quenching agents such as histidine, glycine, ascorbic acid, Tween- 80, sodium sulfite and sodium hyposulfite are commonly used for quenching the residual disinfectant in water. In this paper, in order to select the optimal type and concentration range of quenching agents prior to the Limulus assays, the interference effects of each quenching agent at different concentrations on endotoxin detection were investigated by the Limulus assays of kinetic-turbidity. Our results identified that, as for 0- 1. 0%concentration of histidine, ascorbic acid, Tween-80, sodium sulfite (pH unadjusted and pH neutral), interference on the Limulus assays was existed. Hence, these quenching agents could not be applied as neutralizers prior to Limulus assays. Although, there was no interference on endotoxin detection for the glycine, a yellow color, developed by the quenching products of glycine and glutaric dialdehyde, contributed to false positive results. Hence, glycine should not be used as quenching agents in Limulus assays for samples containing glutaric dialdehyde. Compared with other quenching agents as histidine, glycine, ascorbic acid, Tween-80, sodium sulfite, 0-1. 0% concentration of sodium hyposulfite elicited no obvious interference, while 1. 0% -5. 0% concentration of sodium hyposulfite illustrated exhibition effect for endotoxin detection. All in all, compared with other quenching agents as histidine, glycine, ascorbic acid, Tween-80 and sodium sulfite, sodium hyposulfite is suitable for quenching chemicals prior to endotoxin detection and less than 0. 5% of concentration is allowable.