Analysis of Decision-making Models for Mitigating Accidents in Extreme Conditions
P. Seong,Seongkeun Kang
Abstract:The primary goal of all nuclear power plants (NPPs) around the world is safe operation [1]. To make NPPs safe, many studies have been conducted over several decades. Nevertheless, events and accidents have occurred continuously since NPPs have started generating electricity. Moreover, severe accidents have occurred even though NPPs have been constructed safely and operated securely. Human error is one of the main causes of the NPPs’ events and accidents. As reported by the Institute of Nuclear Power Operations (INPO), about 48% of all events in NPPs during 2010– 2011 were human error. In addition, the Korean database, Operation Performance Information System (OPIS), reported that >20% of all events in Korean NPPs over the past decade (2002–2011) had been human error [2]. In addition, humans are imperfect, particularly under stressful conditions [2]. The main cause of one of the representative severe accidents, the Chernobyl disaster, was human error [3]. Many studies that have sought to reduce human error have been conducted over several decades so that operators do not have to allocate too much of their mental capacity to operating NPPs. In spite of these efforts, humans sometimes make mistakes, so human-related events and accidents have continued at NPPs. Accident domains can be divided into accident prevention and accident mitigation [4]. Most humanrelated studies including human reliability analysis (HRA)-related studies have focused on accident prevention rather than mitigation. While preventing accidents is certainly significant, mitigation is as important as prevention. In the accident prevention domain, the environment is less serious and hazardous for humans, and therefore less stressful. Therefore, the humans who are responsible for controlling the plant can easily communicate and discuss with accurate and useful information. Meanwhile, in the accident mitigation domain, the possibility of the instrument & control (I&C) systems of the NPP breaking due to extreme conditions are higher, so I&C systems may be unable to give correct information on what operators need to diagnose. These extreme situations can lead operators to take on a very high workload and stress. In addition, both I&C systems and communication systems can become useless, thus making communication to create strategies for plant mitigation impossible. Furthermore, if a severe accident occurs, the organization responsible for plant control will change from the small organization in the main control room to a large complex organization in a technical support center (TSC). Nobody can assume that all information from I&C systems is accurate, so information uncertainty in the accident mitigation domain will increase compared to the accident prevention domain. In particular, if plant operators face extreme situations, they will feel anxiety, fear, and panic. Therefore, analyzing what decisionmaking model can be applied in the accident mitigation domain under extreme conditions is essential.
Engineering,Environmental Science