Abstract:Background Central venous catheters are commonly used in healthcare, but they come with a range of potential complications. Over the last 15 years, an influx of securement and dressing products have been released, with unknown overall effectiveness to prevent these complications. Objective To compare the effects of dressings and securement devices for central venous catheters on a range of common complications including catheter-related bloodstream infection, catheter tip colonisation, entry/exit-site infection, skin colonisation, skin irritation, failed catheter securement, dressing durability and mortality. Design Systematic review with meta-analysis. Methods Following standard Cochrane methods, a systematic search of Cochrane Wounds Trials Register, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE Ovid, Embase Ovid, EBSCO CINAHL, and multiple clinical trial registries was completed in November 2022. Randomised controlled trials evaluating the effectiveness of dressing and securement devices for all CVC types were included. A random-effects model was used during the meta-analysis. Results were expressed using risk ratio (RR), rate ratio, or mean difference (MD), with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs). Methodological quality and bias were assessed. Results We included 46 studies involving 10,054 participants. All studies had either an unclear or high-performance bias. The blinding of outcome assessment was unclear in most studies. Chlorhexidine gluconate-impregnated dressings, compared with standard polyurethane dressings, may reduce the incidence (7 studies; N = 5816; RR 0.60, 95 % CI 0.44–0.83; low certainty evidence) and rate (4 studies; N = 4447; RR 0.51, 95 % CI 0.32–0.79; moderate certainty evidence) of catheter-related bloodstream infection and catheter tip colonisation (8 studies; N = 4788; RR 0.70, 95 % CI 0.52–0.95; very low certainty evidence). Medication-impregnated dressings may reduce the incidence of catheter-related bloodstream infection (6 studies; N = 5687; RR 0.60, 95 % CI 0.39–0.93; low certainty evidence) and catheter-tip colonisation (7 studies; N = 4769; RR 0.60, 95 % CI 0.47–0.76; low certainty evidence) relative to non-impregnated dressing types. Tissue adhesive may increase the risk of skin irritation or damage compared with integrated securement dressings (3 studies; N = 166; RR 1.88, 95 % CI 1.09–3.24; low certainty evidence) or sutureless securement devices (4 studies; N = 241; RR 1.64, 95 % CI 1.10–2.44; moderate certainty evidence). Tissue adhesive increased dressing durability compared with integrated securement dressings (MD 43.03 h, 95 % CI 4.88–81.18; moderate certainty evidence) and sutureless securement devices (MD 42.90 h, 4.64–81.16; moderate certainty evidence). Tissue adhesive increased failed catheter securement rate compared with suture (2 studies; N = 103; RR 9.33, 95 % CI 1.10–79.21; moderate certainty evidence). Conclusions The findings of the review provide insights and guidance for clinicians in selecting the appropriate dressings and securements for catheters. Findings should be interpreted with caution due to heterogeneity in catheters and patient types. Registration #CD010367. Tweetable abstract Time to implement chlorhexidine gluconate-impregnated dressings to prevent catheter-related bloodstream infections; a meta-analysis by @GraceNP and team.

Comparison on the effectiveness and cost of three type dressings in the maintenance of pediatric central venous catheters

Study on bacterial colonization at central venous catheter insertion sites by using different adhesive stickers

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of a Transparent Antimicrobial Dressing for Managing Central Venous and Arterial Catheters in Intensive Care Units

Reduction of bacterial colonization and catheter-related infection with antiseptic central venous catheter: a randomized controlled clinical trial

Chlorhexidine gluconate transparent dressing does not decrease central line‐associated bloodstream infection in critically ill patients: A randomized controlled trial

Clinical practice guidelines for the management of central venous catheter for critically ill patients

Observational trial of antibiotic-coated central venous catheters in critically ill pediatric patients

The effectiveness of dressings and securement devices to prevent central venous catheter-associated complications: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Evaluation of Bacterial Cellulose Dressing Versus Vaseline Gauze in Partial Thickness Burn Wounds and Skin Graft Donor Sites: A Two-Center Randomized Controlled Clinical Study

Adherence to guidelines and central-line-associated bloodstream infection occurrence during insertion and maintenance of intravascular catheters: evidence from 20 tertiary hospitals

Sustained reduction of catheter-associated bloodstream infections with enhancement of catheter bundle by chlorhexidine dressings over 11 years

Investigation of catheter-related bloodstream infections in ICU

Effectiveness of transparent film dressing for peripheral intravenous catheter

Effect of the Application of Continuous Cenous Venous Hemofiltration on Pulmonary Vascular Permeability in the Early Stage of Septic Shock

Improving central venous catheter care with chlorhexidine gluconate dressings: evidence from a systematic review and Meta-analysis

Usage of best evidence concerning maintenance of pediatric central venous catheter

Targeting zero catheter-related bloodstream infections in pediatric intensive care unit: a retrospective matched case-control study

Probe into the fi rst dressing change time after PICC

Experimental Study of in Vitro Antibacterial Effect of Nagacf Dressing

Variation in infection prevention practices for peripherally inserted central venous catheters: A survey of neonatal units in England and Wales

Moist dressings in the treatment of pressure injuries: A network meta-analysis