Characteristics of CH_4 Emission and Greenhouse Effects in Double Paddy Soil with Conservation Tillage

WU Fen-lin,ZHANG Hai-lin,LI Lin,CHEN Fu,HUANG Feng-qiu,XIAO Xiao-ping
2008-01-01
Abstract:【Objective】The conventional tillage and burning straw caused much losses of soil organic matter, which made cropland be an emission source of greenhouse gas. The research has been conducted to study the effects of conservation tillage on CH4 emission from paddy soil and explore the greenhouse effect. Further theoretical guide for forecasting carbon sequestration potential of soil and reducing emission of greenhouse are to be provided. 【Method】The analysis of greenhouse gas emission character and greenhouse effect is based on observing greenhouse gas emission from treatments of CT, CTS, RTS and NTS. 【Result】When refer to the different tillages, the difference in CH4 emission flux between CTS and RTS was little during the early rice growth, but they were much more than NTS. During the late rice growth the CH4 emission flux of RTS was much more than CTS and NTS. In winter-fallowed season the CH4 emission flux of each treatment was relative small, and CTS was almost bigger than RTS and NTS. When refer to the straw return, the seasonal emission characters of CH4 from CT and CTS were the same, and in the monitoring period the CH4 emission flux of CTS was a little more than CT. Returning straw mainly increased the CH4 emission of late rice field and winter-fallowed field, and had less influence on early rice field. The greenhouse effect of the whole year was RTS>CTS>NTS>CT, and they were significantly different. The greenhouse effect of paddy soil mainly attributed to CH4emission from early rice field and late rice field, and little attributed to CH4 emission from winter-fallowed field. Comparing to CTS, RTS increased the CH4 emission, and almost 1.98 times of CTS, and NTS released by 15%. Comparing to CTS, CT released CH4 emission by 42%.【Conclusion】RTS was the main way of tillage in the double cropping paddy soil area, and it also lead to the most CH4 emission. This research also showed results that no straw returning soil and no tillage were attributed to release CH4 emission. Straw return to soil is good for soil nutrient and the greenhouse effect of straw in other ways needs to be further researched, so it is suggested that the double-cropping paddy soil area should use conservation tillage and return the straw to soil.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?