Abstract:The clustering problem is a difficult problem for the data stream domain. This is because the large volumes of data arriving in a stream renders most traditional algorithms too inefficient. In recent years, a few one-pass clustering algorithms have been developed for the data stream problem. Although such methods address the scalability issues of the clustering problem, they are generally blind to the evolution of the data and do not address the following issues: (1) The quality of the clusters is poor when the data evolves considerably over time. (2) A data stream clustering algorithm requires much greater functionality in discovering and exploring clusters over different portions of the stream. The widely used practice of viewing data stream clustering algorithms as a class of one-pass clustering algorithms is not very useful from an application point of view. For example, a simple one-pass clustering algorithm over an entire data stream of a few years is dominated by the outdated history of the stream. The exploration of the stream over different time windows can provide the users with a much deeper understanding of the evolving behavior of the clusters. At the same time, it is not possible to simultaneously perform dynamic clustering over all possible time horizons for a data stream of even moderately large volume. This paper discusses a fundamentally different philosophy for data stream clustering which is guided by application-centered requirements. The idea is divide the clustering process into an online component which periodically stores detailed summary statistics and an offine component which uses only this summary statistics. The offine component is utilized by the analyst who can use a wide variety of inputs (such as time horizon or number of clusters) in order to provide a quick understanding of the broad clusters in the data stream. The problems of efficient choice, storage, and use of this statistical data for a fast data stream turns out to be quite tricky. For this purpose, we use the concepts of a pyramidal time frame in conjunction with a microclustering approach. Our performance experiments over a number of real and synthetic data sets illustrate the effectiveness, efficiency, and insights provided by our approach.

Clustering Categorical Data Streams

A Cluster-Based Incremental Recommendation Algorithm on Stream Processing Architecture

Entropy Based Clustering of Data Streams with Mixed Numeric and Categorical Values

A clustering algorithm for distributed time-series data

Hierarchical Spatial Clustering in Multi-Hop Wireless Sensor Networks

An Algorithm for Data Stream Speed Anomaly Detection Based on RCSW

HClustream: A Novel Approach for Clustering Evolving Heterogeneous Data Stream

Clustering Text Data Streams

Subspace Clustering of High Dimensional Data Streams

A framework for clustering evolving data streams

Density-based hierarchical clustering for streaming data

Clustering-training for Data Stream Mining

Incremental Subspace Clustering over Multiple Data Streams

Clustering Categorical Data Based on Distance Vectors

Clustering Stream Data by Exploring the Evolution of Density Mountain

Dynamic grid-based clustering over data stream

Clustering Algorithm for Spatial Data Streams Based on A Grid and Distance Threshold

Cluster Based Rank Query over Multidimensional Data Streams

Dynamic Micro-cluster-Based Streaming Data Clustering Method for Anomaly Detection.

Distributed Data Stream Clustering: A Fast EM-based Approach

ESA-Stream: Efficient Self-Adaptive Online Data Stream Clustering