Abstract:The clustering problem is a difficult problem for the data stream domain. This is because the large volumes of data arriving in a stream renders most traditional algorithms too inefficient. In recent years, a few one-pass clustering algorithms have been developed for the data stream problem. Although such methods address the scalability issues of the clustering problem, they are generally blind to the evolution of the data and do not address the following issues: (1) The quality of the clusters is poor when the data evolves considerably over time. (2) A data stream clustering algorithm requires much greater functionality in discovering and exploring clusters over different portions of the stream. The widely used practice of viewing data stream clustering algorithms as a class of one-pass clustering algorithms is not very useful from an application point of view. For example, a simple one-pass clustering algorithm over an entire data stream of a few years is dominated by the outdated history of the stream. The exploration of the stream over different time windows can provide the users with a much deeper understanding of the evolving behavior of the clusters. At the same time, it is not possible to simultaneously perform dynamic clustering over all possible time horizons for a data stream of even moderately large volume. This paper discusses a fundamentally different philosophy for data stream clustering which is guided by application-centered requirements. The idea is divide the clustering process into an online component which periodically stores detailed summary statistics and an offine component which uses only this summary statistics. The offine component is utilized by the analyst who can use a wide variety of inputs (such as time horizon or number of clusters) in order to provide a quick understanding of the broad clusters in the data stream. The problems of efficient choice, storage, and use of this statistical data for a fast data stream turns out to be quite tricky. For this purpose, we use the concepts of a pyramidal time frame in conjunction with a microclustering approach. Our performance experiments over a number of real and synthetic data sets illustrate the effectiveness, efficiency, and insights provided by our approach.

Density-based hierarchical clustering for streaming data

Density-based clustering of data streams at multiple resolutions

Streaming Hierarchical Clustering Based on Point-Set Kernel

Density-Based Clustering over an Evolving Data Stream with Noise

Improved Data Stream Clustering Algorithm Based on Temporal Density Features

Evolving data stream clustering algorithm based on the shared nearest neighbor density

Streaming spectral clustering

A Clustering Algorithm Based on Density-Grid for Stream Data

Clustering Stream Data by Exploring the Evolution of Density Mountain

A Density-Based Clustering Structure Mining Algorithm for Data Streams

Soft Subspace Clustering Algorithm for Streaming Data

An Adaptive Density Data Stream Clustering Algorithm

Dynamic Density-Based Clustering Algorithm over Uncertain Data Streams

Summarization and Matching of Density-Based Clusters in Streaming Environments

A framework for clustering evolving data streams

Efficient Data Stream Clustering Algorithm Based on k-Means Partitioning and Density

Communication-Efficient and Exact Clustering Distributed Streaming Data

Clustering High Dimensional Data Streams with Representative Points.

Algorithm for clustering uncertain data streams based on density

Data Stream Clustering by Fast Density-Peak-search

Granularity adaptive density estimation and on demand clustering of concept-drifting data streams