Abstract:Predicting the adaptation of populations to a changing environment is crucial to assess the impact of human activities on biodiversity. Many theoretical studies have tackled this issue by modeling the evolution of quantitative traits subject to stabilizing selection around an optimum phenotype, whose value is shifted continuously through time. In this context, the population fate results from the equilibrium distribution of the trait, relative to the moving optimum. Such a distribution may vary with the shape of selection, the system of reproduction, the number of loci, the mutation kernel or their interactions. Here, we develop a methodology that provides quantitative measures of population maladaptation and potential of survival directly from the entire profile of the phenotypic distribution, without any a priori on its <a class="link-external link-http" href="http://shape.We" rel="external noopener nofollow">this http URL</a> investigate two different models of reproduction (asexual and infinitesimal sexual models of inheritance), with general forms of <a class="link-external link-http" href="http://selection.In" rel="external noopener nofollow">this http URL</a> particular, we recover that fitness functions such that selection weakens away from the optimum lead to evolutionary tipping points, with an abrupt collapse of the population when the speed of environmental change is too high. Our unified framework furthermore allows highlighting the underlying mechanisms that lead to this phenomenon. More generally, it allows discussing similarities and discrepancies between the two reproduction models, the latter being ultimately explained by different constraints on the evolution of the phenotypic variance. We demonstrate that the mean fitness in the population crucially depends on the shape of the selection function in the sexual infinitesimal model, in contrast with the asexual <a class="link-external link-http" href="http://model.In" rel="external noopener nofollow">this http URL</a> the asexual model, we also investigate the effect of the mutation kernel and we show that kernels with higher kurtosis tend to reduce maladaptation and improve fitness, especially in fast changing environments.

The expected fitness cost of a mutation fixation under the one-dimensional fisher model

Note on the Computation of Critical Effective Population Sizes.

Properties of selected mutations and genotypic landscapes under Fisher's geometric model

An integrated model of the effects on fitness of beneficial, deleterious, and neutral mutations in sexual populations

Beneficial mutation-selection balance and the effect of linkage on positive selection

Analysis Of The Fitness Effect Of Compensatory Mutations

Fixation probability in a diploid sexually reproducing population

Counterintuitive properties of fixation probability and fixation time in population structures with spatially periodic resource distribution

An estimate of fitness reduction from mutation accumulation in a mammal allows assessment of the consequences of relaxed selection

Kingman's model with random mutation probabilities: convergence and condensation II

From Drift to Draft: How Much Do Beneficial Mutations Actually Contribute to Predictions of Ohta’s Slightly Deleterious Model of Molecular Evolution?

Genomic mutation rates that neutralize adaptive evolution and natural selection

The Effect of Mutators on Adaptability in Time-Varying Fitness Landscapes

Epistasis and the structure of fitness landscapes: are experimental fitness landscapes compatible with Fisher's Geometric model?

Finite genome length corrections for the mean fitness and gene probabilities in evolution models

A biophysical protein folding model accounts for most mutational fitness effects in viruses

The Influence Of Deleterious Mutations On Adaptation In Asexual Populations

Mutation-selection balance with recombination: convergence to equilibrium for polynomial selection costs

Adaptation to a changing environment: what me Normal?

Mutation bias alters the distribution of fitness effects of mutations

A dynamical limit to evolutionary adaptation