Corrigendum to “computing Multiple Lyapunov‐like Functions for Inner Estimates of Domains of Attraction of Switched Hybrid Systems” [international Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, 2018;28(17):5191–5212. DOI: 10.1002/Rnc.4280]
Xing Zheng,Zhikun She,Junjie Lu,Meilun Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/rnc.4372
IF: 3.8973
2018-01-01
International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control
Abstract:For constraint (12) in Section 4.1 and constraint (28) in Section 5.2 in the original paper,1 s9,i, j(x) and s10,i, j(x) ∈ ∑ should be both corrected as positive definite polynomials s9,i, j(x) and s10,i, j(x) ∈ ∑ or nonzero polynomials s9,i, j(x) and s10,i, j(x) ∈ ∑ with degree 0 (ie, positive constant polynomials s9,i, j(x) and s10,i, j(x) ∈ ∑ ). Based on the aforementioned corrections, we can partially reobtain results for the case d = 2 in Example 1 by using nonzero polynomials s9,i, j(x) and s10,i, j(x) ∈ ∑ with degree 0 as follows: Algorithm 2 returns an inner estimate after iterating 13 steps within 220.357 seconds, whose boundary is depicted by red color in Figure 1; Algorithm 3 returns an inner estimate after iterating 2 steps within 326.797 seconds, whose boundary is depicted by blue color in Figure 1. Note that, in the original paper,1 except the case d = 2 in Example 1, s9,i, j(x) and s10,i, j(x) were both preassumed to be nonzero polynomials in ∑ with degree 0 for all other examples when applying SOSTOOLS for implementation. Additionally, since , the transformations for constraints (6) and (7) in both Sections 4.1 and 5.2 are all underapproximative instead of equivalent. Finally, the authors deeply thank Mr Torbjørn Cunis for comments on the mistake caused by s9,i, j(x) and s10,i, j(x) ∈ ∑. The authors also apologize for the mistakes.