Abstract:Studying developers’ behavior in software development tasks is crucial for designing effective techniques and tools to support developers’ daily work. In modern software development, developers frequently use different applications including IDEs, Web Browsers, documentation software (such as Office Word, Excel, and PDF applications), and other tools to complete their tasks. This creates significant challenges in collecting and analyzing developers’ behavior data. Researchers usually instrument the software tools to log developers’ behavior for further studies. This is feasible for studies on development activities using specific software tools. However, instrumenting all software tools commonly used in real work settings is difficult and requires significant human effort. Furthermore, the collected behavior data consist of low-level and fine-grained event sequences, which must be abstracted into high-level development activities for further analysis. This abstraction is often performed manually or based on simple heuristics. In this paper, we propose an approach to address the above two challenges in collecting and analyzing developers’ behavior data. First, we use our ActivitySpace framework to improve the generalizability of the data collection. ActivitySpace uses operating-system level instrumentation to track developer interactions with a wide range of applications in real work settings. Secondly, we use a machine learning approach to reduce the human effort to abstract low-level behavior data. Specifically, considering the sequential nature of the interaction data, we propose a Condition Random Field (CRF) based approach to segment and label the developers’ low-level actions into a set of basic, yet meaningful development activities. To validate the generalizability of the proposed data collection approach, we deploy the ActivitySpace framework in an industry partner’s company and collect the real working data from ten professional developers’ one-week work in three actual software projects. The experiment with the collected data confirms that with initial human-labeled training data, the CRF model can be trained to infer development activities from low-level actions with reasonable accuracy within and across developers and software projects. This suggests that the machine learning approach is promising in reducing the human efforts required for behavior data analysis.

Automating Reusable-Procedure Discovery Through Developer's Action Analysis

Inference of Development Activities from Interaction with Uninstrumented Applications

BPMiner: mining developers' behavior patterns from screen-captured task videos.

Towards Automated Generation of User-Specific Eclipse Wizard

Automating Repetitive Tasks On Web-Based Ides Via An Editable And Reusable Capture-Replay Technique

Editable Replay of IDE-Based Repetitive Tasks

An exploratory study of feature location process: Distinct phases, recurring patterns, and elementary actions

Discovering executable routine specifications from user interaction logs

SPAPE: A semantic-preserving amorphous procedure extraction method for near-miss clones

Towards Automated Synthesis Of Executable Eclipse Tutorials

Procedure Extraction to Improve Scalability of Software Model Checking

An Automate Test Case Generation Approach: Using Match Technique.

Constructing a Software Requirements Tool Based on the Reusability Attribute

RAP: Retrieval-Augmented Planner for Adaptive Procedure Planning in Instructional Videos

How developers perform feature location tasks: a human-centric and process-oriented exploratory study.

Automated improvement for component reuse

DroidWalker: Generating Reproducible Test Cases via Automatic Exploration of Android Apps

Automating Application Software Generation

API Recommendation for Novice Programmers: Build a Bridge of Query-Task Knowledge Gap

An Empirical Study on Automated Test Generation Tools for Java: Effectiveness and Challenges

Detection Of Consistent Patterns From Process Enactment Data