Abstract:Quantifying and comparing the scientific output of researchers has become critical for governments, funding agencies and universities. Comparison by reputation and direct assessment of contributions to the field is no longer possible, as the number of scientists increases and traditional definitions about scientific fields become blurred. The h-index is often used for comparing scientists, but has several well-documented shortcomings. In this paper, we introduce a new index for measuring and comparing the publication records of scientists: the pagerank-index (symbolised as π). The index uses a version of pagerank algorithm and the citation networks of papers in its computation, and is fundamentally different from the existing variants of h-index because it considers not only the number of citations but also the actual impact of each citation. We adapt two approaches to demonstrate the utility of the new index. Firstly, we use a simulation model of a community of authors, whereby we create various 'groups' of authors which are different from each other in inherent publication habits, to show that the pagerank-index is fairer than the existing indices in three distinct scenarios: (i) when authors try to 'massage' their index by publishing papers in low-quality outlets primarily to self-cite other papers (ii) when authors collaborate in large groups in order to obtain more authorships (iii) when authors spend most of their time in producing genuine but low quality publications that would massage their index. Secondly, we undertake two real world case studies: (i) the evolving author community of quantum game theory, as defined by Google Scholar (ii) a snapshot of the high energy physics (HEP) theory research community in arXiv. In both case studies, we find that the list of top authors vary very significantly when h-index and pagerank-index are used for comparison. We show that in both cases, authors who have collaborated in large groups and/or published less impactful papers tend to be comparatively favoured by the h-index, whereas the pagerank-index highlights authors who have made a relatively small number of definitive contributions, or written papers which served to highlight the link between diverse disciplines, or typically worked in smaller groups. Thus, we argue that the pagerank-index is an inherently fairer and more nuanced metric to quantify the publication records of scientists compared to existing measures.

The W-Index: A Measure to Assess Scientific Impact by Focusing on Widely Cited Papers

The w-index: A measure to assess scientific impact by focusing on widely cited papers

x-index: a fantastic new indicator for quantifying a scientist's scientific impact.

Weighted citation based on ranking-related contribution: a new index for evaluating article impact

WL-index: Leveraging Citation Mention Number to Quantify an Individual's Scientific Impact

Which h-index? An exploration within the Web of Science

Evaluation of Authors' Academic Influence Based on Weighted H-Index.

The H L -Index: Improvement of H -Index Based on Quality of Citing Papers

The H’-Index, Effectively Improving the H-Index Based on the Citation Distribution

The Pagerank-Index: Going beyond Citation Counts in Quantifying Scientific Impact of Researchers

The x-index: A new citation-distance-based index to measure academic influence

A WoS-based Positive Study on the h-index of Scientists in Natural Sciences

Analyzing research performance: proposition of a new complementary index

$$H_u$$-Index: a Unified Index to Quantify Individuals Across Disciplines

The E-Index, Complementing The H-Index For Excess Citations

The strike rate index: a new index for journal quality based on journal size and the h-index of citations

Quantifying a Paper’s Academic Impact by Distinguishing the Unequal Intensities and Contributions of Citations

Modification of the Rational h Index by Considering More Citation Information

Quality Research Follows the Power Law

E-Index—A Bibliometric Index of Research Efficiency

An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output