Abstract:At early phases of a product development lifecycle of large scale Cyber-Physical Systems (CPSs), a large number of requirements need to be assigned to stakeholders from different organizations or departments of the same organization for review, clarification and checking their conformance to standards and regulations. These requirements have various characteristics such as extents of importance to the organization, complexity, and dependencies between each other, thereby requiring different effort (workload) to review and clarify. While working with our industrial partners in the domain of CPSs, we discovered an optimization problem, where an optimal solution is required for assigning requirements to various stakeholders by maximizing their familiarity to assigned requirements, meanwhile balancing the overall workload of each stakeholder. In this direction, we propose a fitness function that takes into account all the above-mentioned factors to guide a search algorithm to find an optimal solution. As a pilot experiment, we first investigated four commonly applied search algorithms (i.e., GA, (1 + 1) EA, AVM, RS) together with the proposed fitness function and results show that (1 + 1) EA performs significantly better than the other algorithms. Since our optimization problem is multi-objective, we further empirically evaluated the performance of the fitness function with six multi-objective search algorithms (CellDE, MOCell, NSGA-II, PAES, SMPSO, SPEA2) together with (1 + 1) EA (the best in the pilot study) and RS (as the baseline) in terms of finding an optimal solution using an real-world case study and 120 artificial problems of varying complexity. Results show that both for the real-world case study and the artificial problems (1 + 1) EA achieved the best performance for each single objective and NSGA-II achieved the best performance for the overall fitness. NSGA-II has the ability to solve a wide range of problems without having their performance degraded significantly and (1 + 1) EA is not fit for problems with less than 250 requirements Therefore we recommend that, if a project manager is interested in a particular objective then (1 + 1) EA should be used; otherwise, NSGA-II should be applied to obtain optimal solutions when putting the overall fitness as the first priority.

A search based approach to fairness analysis in requirement assignments to aid negotiation, mediation and decision making

&Amp;#147;fairness Analysis&#148; in Requirements Assignments

Comparing the Performance of Metaheuristics for the Analysis of Multi-Stakeholder Tradeoffs in Requirements Optimisation

Towards Fairness-Aware Multi-Objective Optimization

A Multi-Objective and Cost-Aware Optimization of Requirements Assignment for Review.

A guide to formulating fairness in an optimization model

Joint Optimization of AI Fairness and Utility: A Human-Centered Approach

Zen-ReqOptimizer: a Search-Based Approach for Requirements Assignment Optimization

Applying Search Algorithms for Optimizing Stakeholders Familiarity and Balancing Workload in Requirements Assignment

Achieving Universal Fairness in Machine Learning: A Multi-objective Optimization Perspective

Integrating Weight Assignment Strategies With NSGA-II for Supporting User Preference Multiobjective Optimization.

Algorithmic Challenges in Ensuring Fairness at the Time of Decision

Balancing Efficiency with Equality: Auction Design with Group Fairness Concerns

Beyond Individual and Group Fairness

When Fairness Meets Consistency in AHP Pairwise Comparisons

EARN Fairness: Explaining, Asking, Reviewing and Negotiating Artificial Intelligence Fairness Metrics Among Stakeholders

A Multi-Objective Optimization Framework for Multi-Stakeholder Fairness-Aware Recommendation

Achieving Diversity in Objective Space for Sample-efficient Search of Multiobjective Optimization Problems

Explaining how your AI system is fair

Testing the Fairness-Accuracy Improvability of Algorithms