Abstract:Algorithmic decision-making in societal contexts, such as retail pricing, loan administration, recommendations on online platforms, etc., can be framed as stochastic optimization under bandit feedback, which typically requires experimentation with different decisions for the sake of learning. Such experimentation often results in perceptions of unfairness among people impacted by these decisions; for instance, there have been several recent lawsuits accusing companies that deploy algorithmic pricing practices of price gouging. Motivated by the changing legal landscape surrounding algorithmic decision-making, we introduce the well-studied fairness notion of envy-freeness within the context of stochastic convex optimization. Our notion requires that upon receiving decisions in the present time, groups do not envy the decisions received by any of the other groups, both in the present as well as the past. This results in a novel trajectory-constrained stochastic optimization problem that renders existing techniques inapplicable. The main technical contribution of this work is to show problem settings where there is no gap in achievable regret (up to logarithmic factors) when envy-freeness is imposed. In particular, in our main result, we develop a near-optimal envy-free algorithm that achieves $\tilde{O}(\sqrt{T})$ regret for smooth convex functions that satisfy the PL inequality. This algorithm has a coordinate-descent structure, in which we carefully leverage gradient information to ensure monotonic sampling along each dimension, while avoiding overshooting the constrained optimum with high probability. This latter aspect critically uses smoothness and the structure of the envy-freeness constraints, while the PL inequality allows for sufficient progress towards the optimal solution. We discuss several open questions that arise from this analysis, which may be of independent interest.

Algorithmic Challenges in Ensuring Fairness at the Time of Decision

Algorithmic Challenges in Ensuring Fairness at the Time of Decision

Long-term Fairness For Real-time Decision Making: A Constrained Online Optimization Approach

Time Fairness in Online Knapsack Problems

Fair and Unbiased Algorithmic Decision Making: Current State and Future Challenges

Fairness in Learning-Based Sequential Decision Algorithms: A Survey

On the Long-term Impact of Algorithmic Decision Policies: Effort Unfairness and Feature Segregation through Social Learning

Systemic Fairness

Temporal Fairness in Decision Making Problems

On the Advantages of Distinguishing Between Predictive and Allocative Fairness in Algorithmic Decision-Making

Algorithmic Fairness: Choices, Assumptions, and Definitions

Designing Equitable Algorithms

Learning to be Fair: A Consequentialist Approach to Equitable Decision-Making

Factors Influencing Perceived Fairness in Algorithmic Decision-Making: Algorithm Outcomes, Development Procedures, and Individual Differences

Algorithmic Fairness and Social Welfare

How Do Fairness Definitions Fare? Examining Public Attitudes Towards Algorithmic Definitions of Fairness

Bridging Machine Learning and Mechanism Design towards Algorithmic Fairness

Fairness in Matching under Uncertainty

Fairness-aware Online Price Discrimination with Nonparametric Demand Models

Active Fairness in Algorithmic Decision Making

Algorithmic Fairness with Feedback