Advanced Techniques for Mitigating the Effects of Temporal Distortions in Human in the Loop Control Systems

Liwen Guo

2005-01-01

Abstract:The desire to create more complex visual scenes in modern flight simulators outpaces recent increases in processor speed. As a result, the simulation transport delay remains a problem. Because of the limitations shown in the three prominent existing delay compensators—the lead/lag filter, the McFarland compensator and the Sobiski/Cardullo predictor—new approaches of compensating the transport delay in a flight simulator have been developed. The first novel compensator is the adaptive predictor making use of the Kalman filter algorithm in a unique manner so that the predictor can provide accurately the desired amount of prediction, significantly reducing the large spikes caused by the McFarland predictor. Among several simplified online adaptive predictors it illustrates mathematically why the stochastic approximation algorithm achieves the best compensation results. A second novel approach employed a reference aircraft dynamics model to implement a state space predictor on a flight simulator. The practical implementation formed the filter state vector from the operator's control input and the aircraft states. The relationship between the reference model and the compensator performance was investigated in great detail, and the best performing reference model was selected for implementation in the final tests. Piloted simulation tests were conducted for assessing the effectiveness of the two novel compensators in comparison to the McFarland predictor and no compensation. Thirteen pilots with heterogeneous flight experience executed straight-in and offset approaches, at various delay configurations, on a flight simulator where different predictors were applied to compensate for transport delay. Four metrics—the glide slope and touchdown errors, power spectral density of the pilot control inputs, NASA Task Load Index, and Cooper-Harper rating on the handling qualities—were employed for the analyses. The overall analyses show that while the adaptive predictor results in slightly poorer compensation for short added delay (up to 48 ms) and better compensation for long added delay (up to 192 ms) than the McFarland compensator, the state space predictor is fairly superior for short delay and significantly superior for long delay to the McFarland compensator. The state space predictor also achieves better compensation than the adaptive predictor. The results of the evaluation on the effectiveness of these predictors in the piloted tests agree with those in the theoretical offline tests conducted with the recorded simulation aircraft states.