Abstract:Using the comparative approach, researchers draw inferences about the evolution of cognition. Psychologists have postulated several hypotheses to explain why certain species are cognitively more flexible than others, and these hypotheses assume that certain cognitive skills are linked together to create a generally “smart” species. However, empirical findings suggest that several animal species are highly specialized, showing exceptional skills in single cognitive domains while performing poorly in others. Although some cognitive skills may indeed overlap, we cannot a priori assume that they do across species. We argue that the term “cognition” has often been used by applying an anthropocentric viewpoint rather than a biocentric one. As a result, researchers tend to overrate cognitive skills that are human-like and assume that certain skills cluster together in other animals as they do in our own species. In this paper, we emphasize that specific physical and social environments create selection pressures that lead to the evolution of certain cognitive adaptations. Skills such as following the pointing gesture, tool-use, perspective-taking, or the ability to cooperate evolve independently from each other as a concrete result of specific selection pressures, and thus have appeared in distantly related species. Thus, there is not “one cognition”. Our argument is founded upon traditional Darwinian thinking, which—although always at the forefront of biology—has sometimes been neglected in animal cognition research. In accordance with the biocentric approach, we advocate a broader empirical perspective as we are convinced that to better understand animal minds, comparative researchers should focus much more on questions and experiments that are ecologically valid. We should investigate nonhuman cognition for its own sake, not only in comparison to the human model.

To know or not to know? Curiosity and the value of prospective information in animals

Curiosity: primate neural circuits for novelty and information seeking

A transdisciplinary view on curiosity beyond linguistic humans: animals, infants, and artificial intelligence

The Psychology and Neuroscience of Curiosity

Towards a neuroscience of active sampling and curiosity

Counterfactual curiosity: motivated thinking about what might have been

Uncertainty avoidance versus conditioned reinforcement: exploring paradoxical choice in rats

Metacognition of curiosity: People underestimate the seductive lure of non-instrumental information

Curiosity as a Metacognitive Feeling

Curiosity and the dynamics of optimal exploration

Five Properties of Specific Curiosity You Didn't Know Curious Machines Should Have

The Role of Umwelt in Animal Curiosity: A Within and Between Species Comparison of Novelty Exploration in Mongooses

A rational analysis of curiosity

The psychology of curiosity: A review and reinterpretation.

Why Are Humans Curious? Concept, Functions and Theories of Interpersonal Curiosity

Old and New Approaches to Animal Cognition: There Is Not “One Cognition”

"I Want to Know the Answer! Give Me Fish 'n' Chips!": the Impact of Curiosity on Indulgent Choice

Individual differences in information demand have a low dimensional structure predicted by some curiosity traits

A Thirst for Knowledge: Grounding Curiosity, Creativity, and Aesthetics in Memory and Reward Neural Systems

Rats did not show evidence of prospective information-seeking: a pilot study

The Gilding-the-Lily Effect: Exploratory Behavior Energized by Curiosity