Abstract:Purpose: Relaxometry, specifically T1 and T2 mapping, has become an essential technique for assessing the properties of biological tissues related to various physiological and pathological conditions. Many techniques are being used to estimate T1 and T2 relaxation times, ranging from the traditional inversion or saturation recovery and spin echo sequences to more advanced methods. Choosing the appropriate method for a specific application is critical since the precision and accuracy of T1 and T2 measurements are influenced by a variety of factors including the pulse sequence and its parameters, the inherent properties of the tissue being examined, the MRI hardware, and the image reconstruction. The aim of this study is to evaluate and compare the test retest reproducibility of two advanced MRI relaxometry techniques (Driven Equilibrium Single Pulse Observation of T1 and T2, DESPOT, and 3D Quantification using an interleaved Look Locker acquisition Sequence with a T2 preparation pulse, QALAS), for T1 and T2 mapping in a healthy volunteer cohort. Methods: 10 healthy volunteers underwent brain MRI at 1.3 mm3 isotropic resolution, acquiring DESPOT and QALAS data (about 11.8 and about 5 minutes duration, including field maps, respectively), test retest with subject repositioning, on a 3.0 Tesla Philips Ingenia Elition scanner. To reconstruct the T1 and T2 maps, we used an equation based algorithm for DESPOT and a dictionary based algorithm that incorporates inversion efficiency and B1 field inhomogeneity for QALAS. The test retest reproducibility was assessed using the coefficient of variation (CoV), intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland Altman plots. Results: Our results indicate that both the DESPOT and QALAS techniques demonstrate good levels of test retest reproducibility for T1 and T2 mapping across the brain. Higher whole brain voxel to voxel ICCs are observed in QALAS for T1 (0.84) and in DESPOT for T2 (0.897). The Bland Altman plots show smaller bias and variability of T1 estimates for QALAS (mean of negative 0.02 s, and upper and lower limits of negative 0.14 and 0.11 s, 95% CI) than for DESPOT (mean of negative 0.02 s, and limits of negative 0.31 and 0.27 s). QALAS also showed less variability (mean 1.08 ms, limits negative 1.88 to 4.04 ms) for T2 compared to DESPOT (mean of 2.56 ms, and limits negative 17.29 to 22.41 ms). The within subject CoVs for QALAS range from 0.6% (T2 in CSF) to 5.8% (T2 in GM), while for DESPOT they range from 2.1% (T2 in CSF) to 6.7% (T2 in GM). The between subject CoVs for QALAS range from 2.5% (T2 in GM) to 12% (T2 in CSF), and for DESPOT they range from 3.7% (T2 in WM) to 9.3% (T2 in CSF). Conclusion: Overall, QALAS demonstrated better reproducibility for T1 and T2 measurements than DESPOT, in addition to reduced acquisition time.

Novel spin‐lock time sampling strategies for improved reproducibility in quantitative T1ρ mapping

A Robust Adiabatic Constant Amplitude Spin‐lock Preparation Module for Myocardial T1ρ Quantification at 3 T

Experimental evaluation of accelerated T1rho relaxation quantification in human liver using limited spin-lock times.

Quantification of T(1ρ) relaxation by using rotary echo spin-lock pulses in the presence of B(0) inhomogeneity.

Quantification of the rotating frame relaxation time T2ρ: Comparison of balanced spin‐lock and continuous‐wave Malcolm‐Levitt preparations

Repeat it without me: Crowdsourcing the T1 mapping common ground via the ISMRM reproducibility challenge

Effect of spin-lock frequency on quantitative myocardial T1ρ mapping

Ultrafast T2 and T2* mapping using single‐shot spatiotemporally encoded MRI with reduced field of view and spiral out‐in‐out‐in trajectory

Comparison of test-retest reproducibility of DESPOT and 3D-QALAS for water T1 and T2 mapping

Repeatability and Accuracy of MR-STAT Quantitative T1 and T2 Measurements

A 4‐minute Solution for Submillimeter Whole‐brain T1ρ Quantification

Comparison of test-retest reproducibility of DESPOT and 3D-QALAS for water T 1 and T 2 mapping

Effects of Spin-Lock Field Direction on the Quantitative Measurement of Spin-Lattice Relaxation Time Constant in the Rotating Frame (t1ρ) in a Clinical MRI System.

Fast cardiac T1ρ,adiab mapping using slice‐selective adiabatic spin‐lock preparation pulses

On the selection of sampling points for myocardial T1 mapping

Revisiting Spin-Lattice Relaxation Time Measurements for Dilute Spins in High-Resolution Solid-State NMR Spectroscopy.

No-wait inversion—a novel model for T1 mapping from inversion recovery measurements without the waiting times

High Spatial-Resolution and Acquisition-Efficiency Cardiac MR T1 Mapping Based on Radial bSSFP and a Low-Rank Tensor Constraint

Rapid high-resolution T1 mapping using a highly accelerated radial steady-state free-precession technique

B1 inhomogeneity-corrected T1 mapping and quantitative magnetization transfer imaging via simultaneously estimating Bloch-Siegert shift and magnetization transfer effects

A novel myocardial T1 analysis method robust to fluctuations in longitudinal magnetization recovery due to heart rate variability in polarity-corrected inversion time preparation