Abstract:Abstract We continuously talk about autonomous technologies. But how can words qualifying technologies be the very same words chosen by Kant to define what is essentially human, i.e. being autonomous? The article focuses on a possible answer by reflecting upon both etymological and philosophical issues, as well as upon the case of autonomous vehicles. Most interestingly, on the one hand, we have the notion of (human) “autonomy”, meaning that there is a “law” that is “self-given”, and, on the other hand, we have the notion of (technological) “automation”, meaning that there is something “offhand” that is “self-given”. Yet, we are experiencing a kind of twofold shift: on the one hand, the shift from defining technologies in terms of automation to defining technologies in terms of autonomy and, on the other hand, the shift from defining humans in terms of autonomy to defining humans in terms of automation. From a philosophical perspective, the shift may mean that we are trying to escape precisely from what autonomy founds, i.e. individual responsibility of humans that, in the Western culture, have been defined for millennia as rational and moral decision-makers, even when their decisions have been the toughest. More precisely, the shift may mean that we are using technologies, and in particular emerging algorithmic technologies, as scapegoats that bear responsibility for us by making decisions for us. Moreover, if we consider the kind of emerging algorithmic technologies that increasingly surround us, starting from autonomous vehicles, then we may argue that we also seem to create a kind of technological divine that, by being always with us through its immanent omnipresence, omniscience, omnipotence and inscrutability, can always be our technological scapegoat freeing us from the most unbearable burden of individual responsibility resulting from individual autonomy.

TechnoABLEISM versus TechnoENABLEISM

Technology for people, not disabilities: ensuring access and inclusion

The Evolution of Assistive Technology: A Literature Review of Technology Developments and Applications

Is Technology Good for Us? A Eudaimonic Meta-Model for Evaluating the Contributive Capability of Technologies for a Good Life

From Therapy to Technological Enhancement: A Socio-Ethical Perspective

The "Second Place" Problem: Assistive Technology in Sports and (Re) Constructing Normal

Second Thoughts on Enhancement and Disability

Assistive technology provision: towards an international framework for assuring availability and accessibility of affordable high-quality assistive technology

Technology and disabilities: Why it can help and hinder learning

Choosing Flourishing: Toward a More "Binocular" Way of Thinking about Disability

On Technological Determinism

How Technology Impacts and Compares to Humans in Socially Consequential Arenas

Disability 4.0: bioethical considerations on the use of embodied artificial intelligence

An alternative perspective on assistive technology: The person–environment–tool (PET) model

From assistive to inclusive? A systematic review of the uses and effects of technology to support people with pervasive support needs

Human autonomy, technological automation (and reverse)

Assistive technology requires an intersectoral approach

Will AI allow us to dispense with all or most accessibility regulations?

Assistive Technology's Potential to Improve Employment of People with Disabilities

Assistive technology and people: a position paper from the first global research, innovation and education on assistive technology (GREAT) summit

The effects on sports performance of technologic advances in sports prostheses and wheelchairs