Abstract:This study finds, for the 2019 Raikoke eruption, that uncertainties in volcanic ash concentration and along‐flight dosages associated with structural model choices are smaller than those associated with satellite constrained eruption source parameters and internal model parameter uncertainties. Producing quantitative volcanic ash forecasts is challenging due to multiple sources of uncertainty. Careful consideration of this uncertainty is required to produce timely and robust hazard warnings. Structural uncertainty occurs when a model fails to produce accurate forecasts, despite good knowledge of the eruption source parameters, meteorological conditions and suitable parameterizations of transport and deposition processes. This uncertainty is frequently overlooked in forecasting practices. Using a Lagrangian particle dispersion model, simulations with varied output spatial resolution, temporal averaging period and particle release rate are performed to quantify the impact of these structural choices. This experiment reveals that, for the 2019 Raikoke eruption, structural choices give measurements of peak ash concentration spanning an order of magnitude, significantly impacting decision‐relevant thresholds used in aviation flight planning. Conversely, along‐flight dosage estimates exhibit less sensitivity to structural choices, suggesting it is a more robust metric to use in flight planning. Uncertainty can be reduced by eliminating structural choices that do not result in a favourable level of agreement with a high‐resolution reference simulation. Reliable forecasts require output spatial resolution ≤ 80 km, temporal averaging periods ≤ 3 h and particle release rates ≥ 5000 particles/h. This suggests that simulations with relatively small numbers of particles could be used to produce a large ensemble of simulations without significant loss of accuracy. Comparison with previous Raikoke simulations indicates that the uncertainty associated with these constrained structural choices is smaller than those associated with satellite constrained eruption source parameter and internal model parameter uncertainties. Thus, given suitable structural choices, other epistemic sources of uncertainty are likely to dominate. This insight is useful for the design of ensemble methodologies which are required to enable a shift from deterministic to probabilistic forecasting. The results are applicable to other long‐range dispersion problems and to Eulerian dispersion models.

Estimating volcanic ash emissions using retrieved satellite ash columns and inverse ash transport modeling using VolcanicAshInversion v1.2.1, within the operational eEMEP (emergency European Monitoring and Evaluation Programme) volcanic plume forecasting system (version rv4_17)

Estimating volcanic ash emissions using retrieved satellite ash columns and inverse ash transport modelling

An inverse method to estimate emission rates based on nonlinear least-squares-based ensemble four-dimensional variational data assimilation with local air concentration measurements

Using Simulated Radiances to Understand the Limitations of Satellite‐Retrieved Volcanic Ash Data and the Implications for Volcanic Ash Cloud Forecasting

Retrieval of Volcanic Ash Parameters from Satellite Data

Uncertainties in the atmospheric loading to ice-sheet deposition for volcanic aerosols and implications for forcing reconstruction

An adaptive semi-Lagrangian advection model for transport of volcanic emissions in the atmosphere

Evaluation and bias correction of probabilistic volcanic ash forecasts

A New Algorithm for the Retrieval of Volcanic Ash Cloud Properties using MSG-SEVIRI and Artificial Neural Networks

Technical note: Exploring parameter and meteorological uncertainty via emulation in volcanic ash atmospheric dispersion modelling

Atmospheric Dispersion Modelling at the London VAAC: A Review of Developments since the 2010 Eyjafjallajökull Volcano Ash Cloud

The effects of simulating volcanic aerosol radiative feedbacks with WRF-Chem during the Eyjafjallajökull eruption, April and May 2010

How dependent are quantitative volcanic ash concentration and along‐flight dosage forecasts to model structural choices?

Retrieval of Volcanic Ash Cloud Base Height Using Machine Learning Algorithms

4D-Var Inversion of European NH3 Emissions Using CrIS NH3 Measurements and GEOS-Chem Adjoint With Bi-Directional and Uni-Directional Flux Schemes

Near-real-time volcanic cloud monitoring: insights into global explosive volcanic eruptive activity through analysis of Volcanic Ash Advisories

Assessing the Iterative Finite Difference Mass Balance and 4d‐var Methods to Derive Ammonia Emissions over North America Using Synthetic Observations

Quantification of ash sedimentation dynamics through depolarisation imaging with AshCam

WRF-Chem optimization for the estimation of Etna volcanic ash fallout

NEIVAv1.0: Next-generation Emissions InVentory expansion of Akagi et al. (2011) version 1.0

High-resolution Hybrid Inversion of IASI Ammonia Columns to Constrain US Ammonia Emissions Using the CMAQ Adjoint Model