Effect of residual bone height and implant macro-design on primary stability in sinus floor elevation: an ex-vivo study

Berkay Tokuc,Merve Cakir,Gül Merve Yalçın Ülker,Onur Geçkili,Deniz Gökçe Meral,Bahadır Kan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1563/aaid-joi-d-22-00197
2024-01-24
Journal of Oral Implantology
Abstract:Objectives: To evaluate the influence of residual bone height (RBH) and implant macro-design on primary stability (PS) of implants using a simultaneous sinus floor elevation (SFE) and implant insertion model. Method and Materials: Fresh bovine rib samples, resembled type-IV density which confirmed by computerized tomography, were prepared to represent four groups of varying RBHs (3,6,9, and 15 mm). To simulate simultaneous implant insertion with SFE, 120 implants in different macro-designs (group R: NobelReplace; group P: NobelParallel; and group A: NobelActive, Nobel Biocare, Gothenburg, Sweden) were randomly inserted at RBHs of 3, 6, 9, and 15 mm in each rib. Implant stability quotient (ISQ) were measured immediately after implant insertion. Results: RBH and implant macro-design have an impact on ISQ values (P < .001). ISQ values were the highest with RBH of 15 mm, followed by RBHs of 9, 6, and 3 mm. (P <.001). There was no statistically significant difference between different implant macrodesigns at RBHs of 3 and 15 mm regarding ISQ values (P = .111, P = .551). ISQ values of group P were higher than of group R and group A at a RBH of 6 mm (P =.049, P = .029). ISQ values were also higher in group P compared to group A at a RBH of 9 mm (P = .006). Conclusion: The higher PS may be expected in sites with higher RBH, regardless of the macro-design. In addition, cylindric implant design may enhance the PS at RBHs of 6 and 9 mm in simultaneous implant insertion with SFE.
dentistry, oral surgery & medicine
What problem does this paper attempt to address?