Abstract:Problem definition: This paper studies an entrepreneur’s pricing strategy in a reward-based crowdfunding campaign under asymmetric product quality information. We propose two signaling mechanisms and investigate how entrepreneurs can leverage their pricing strategy to signal a high-quality project. Academic/practical relevance: This problem is relevant to practice, as asymmetric quality information is a significant concern in reward-based crowdfunding. High-quality entrepreneurs seek credible mechanisms to signal the quality of projects to customers. Methodology: We develop a stylized game-theoretic signaling model with funding and regular selling periods that captures asymmetric quality information between an entrepreneur and customers. Results: We propose a new theory on quality signaling in crowdfunding. We show that contingent access to the regular selling market after running a successful crowdfunding campaign allows high-quality entrepreneurs to signal their quality through low funding prices (one-price signaling). A high-quality entrepreneur can increase his funding price and still signal his high-quality level if he commits to the future regular selling price (two-price signaling). We show that the distinct feature of crowdfunding, that is, the probabilistic nature of crowdfunding, plays different roles in one- and two-price signaling. It is the driving force for the separating equilibrium in one-price signaling, and in two-price signaling, it affects how the entrepreneur should manipulate his funding and regular selling prices to reduce signaling cost. Managerial implications: Entrepreneurs should be mindful of pricing in funding and regular selling periods because it could play an essential role in signaling quality information. Our findings suggest practical tools for quality signaling in crowdfunding. We also investigate when price commitment is the most beneficial for a high-quality entrepreneur, looking for potential signaling mechanisms. Funding: W. Zhou acknowledges financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China [Grant 72192823 and Grant 71821002]. Supplemental Material: The online appendices are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2022.1177 .

Early contributors and fair rewards in crowdfunding

An Incentive Mechanism for Crowdsourcing Systems with Network Effects

When to Use Rewards in Charitable Crowdfunding

Incentivizing Crowdsourcing Systems with Network Effects

Reward-Based Crowdfunding Versus Initial Coin Offerings

Reward-Based Crowdfunding vs. Initial Coin Offering

Fair Allocation in Crowd-Sourced Systems

Strategic Pricing and Information Disclosure in Crowdfunding

Keep It or Give Back? Optimal Pricing Strategy of Reward-Based Crowdfunding with a Hybrid Mechanism in the Sharing Economy

Reward Versus Altruistic Motivations in Reward-Based Crowdfunding

Analyzing Crowdfunding of Public Projects Under Dynamic Beliefs

Redistributing Funds across Charitable Crowdfunding Campaigns

Financing A Free-for-All: Crowdfunding Open-Source Software

The Crowdfunding Game

Signaling and herding in reward-based crowdfunding

Project Implementation Success in Reward-Based Crowdfunding: an Empirical Study

Can Early Joining Participants Contribute More? - Timeliness Sensitive Incentivization for Crowdsensing.

Quality Signaling Through Crowdfunding Pricing

Experts in the crowd and their influence on herding in reward-based crowdfunding of cultural projects

Does Crowdfunding Benefit Entrepreneurs and Venture Capital Investors?

Crowdfunding Models: Keep-it-All vs. All-or-Nothing