Abstract:BACKGROUND: There is increased interest in quantitative ultrasound for osteoporosis screening because it predicts fracture risk, is portable, and is relatively inexpensive. However, there is no consensus regarding its accuracy for identifying patients with osteoporosis.PURPOSE: To determine the sensitivity and specificity of calcaneal quantitative ultrasound for identifying patients who meet the World Health Organization's diagnostic criteria for osteoporosis. Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) was used as the reference standard.DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE (1966 to October 2005), EMBASE (1993 to May 2004), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (1952 to March 2004), and the Science Citation Index (1945 to April 2004).STUDY SELECTION: English-language articles that evaluated the sensitivity and specificity of calcaneal quantitative ultrasound for identifying adults with DXA T-scores of -2.5 or less at the hip or spine.DATA EXTRACTION: Two authors independently reviewed articles and abstracted data.DATA SYNTHESIS: The authors identified 1908 potentially relevant articles, of which 25 met the inclusion criteria, and calculated the sensitivity and specificity of quantitative ultrasound over a range of thresholds. For the quantitative ultrasound index parameter T-score cutoff threshold of -1, sensitivity was 79% (95% CI, 69% to 86%) and specificity was 58% (CI, 44% to 70%) for identifying individuals with DXA T-scores of -2.5 or less at the hip or spine. For a T-score threshold of 0, sensitivity improved to 93% (CI, 87% to 97%) but specificity decreased to 24% (CI, 10% to 47%). At a pretest probability of 22% (for example, a 65-year-old white woman at average risk), the post-test probability of DXA-determined osteoporosis was 34% (CI, 26% to 41%) after a positive result and 10% (CI, 5% to 12%) after a negative result when using a T-score cutoff threshold of -1. Analysis of other quantitative ultrasound parameters (for example, broadband ultrasound attenuation) revealed similar estimates of accuracy.LIMITATIONS: The relatively small number of included studies limited the authors' ability to evaluate the effects of heterogeneous study characteristics on the diagnostic accuracy of quantitative ultrasound.CONCLUSIONS: The currently available literature suggests that results of calcaneal quantitative ultrasound at commonly used cutoff thresholds do not definitively exclude or confirm DXA-determined osteoporosis. Additional research is needed before use of this test can be recommended in evidence-based screening programs for osteoporosis.

Osteopenia and Osteoporosis Screening Detection: Calcaneal Quantitative Ultrasound with and without Calibration Factor Comparison to Gold Standard Dual X-ray Absorptiometry

Pre-screening for osteoporosis with calcaneus quantitative ultrasound and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry bone density

Diagnostic value of calcaneal quantitative ultrasound in the evaluation of osteoporosis in middle-aged and elderly patients

Validation of Quantitative Ultrasonography for Osteoporosis Diagnosis in Postmenopausal Women Compared to Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry (DEXA)

The role of quantitative ultrasound in predicting osteoporosis defined by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in pre- and postmenopausal women

Quantitative ultrasound scans of the calcaneus: a useful tool for screening osteoporosis in patients with connective tissue disease

Performance of calcaneus quantitative ultrasound and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in the discrimination of prevalent asymptomatic osteoporotic fractures in postmenopausal women

Meta-Analysis: Accuracy of Quantitative Ultrasound for Identifying Patients with Osteoporosis

The clinical value of calcaneus stiffness index calculated by quantitative ultrasound test in screening and diagnosis of osteoporosis

Discordance between quantitative ultrasound and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in bone mineral density: The Vietnam Osteoporosis Study

Quantitative ultrasound of the calcaneus (QUS): A valuable tool in the identification of patients with non-metastatic prostate cancer requiring screening for osteoporosis

A population-based study examining calcaneus quantitative ultrasound and its optimal cut-points to discriminate osteoporotic fractures among 9352 Chinese women and men.

Quantitative Ultrasound and Bone Health in Elderly People, a Systematic Review

Ultrasonic Backscatter Measurements at the Calcaneus: an in Vivo Study

Noninvasive screening of osteoporosis using bio-impedance and quantitative ultrasound

Cost effectiveness of ultrasound and bone densitometry for osteoporosis screening in post-menopausal women

Opportunistic Use of CT Imaging for Osteoporosis Screening and Bone Density Assessment: A Qualitative Systematic Review

Comparison of Quantitative Computed Tomography and Dual X-Ray Absorptiometry: Osteoporosis Detection Rates in Diabetic Patients

Quantitative ultrasound techniques for the assessment of osteoporosis: expert agreement on current status. The International Quantitative Ultrasound Consensus Group

The self-control comparison of ultrasound and DXA in measurement of Bone medical density(BMD) in Hangzhou females

Quantitative computed tomography has higher sensitivity detecting critical bone mineral density compared to dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in postmenopausal women and elderly men with osteoporotic fractures: a real-life study