Abstract:Background and objective: One of the primary advantages of minimally invasive surgery is the shorter hospitalization time, which can potentially allow "outpatient" (OP) procedures. The recent advent of single-port (SP) robotics has further fueled the debate on this topic. We sought to provide an evidence-based analysis of the safety, feasibility, and advantages of robotic urological surgery in the OP setting. Methods: A literature search in PubMed was conducted in June 2024 to identify studies on the feasibility and safety of OP robotic urological surgery. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses criteria and the Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome model were used to select retrospective and prospective studies. Data collected included patient characteristics, operative outcomes, same-day discharge (SDD), and complication and readmission rates. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Data analysis and synthesis were performed using Review Manager and GraphPad Prism. Key findings and limitations: For 3291 patients in noncomparative studies, we found SDD rates of 46.17% for multiport (MP) robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP), 77.35% for SP-RARP, 93.1% for robot-assisted radical or partial nephrectomy, and 93.3% for adrenalectomy. Among comparative studies involving 4130 patients, we found that the OP setting is feasible and safe. Comparison of overall complications between OP and inpatients (IP) settings revealed a relative risk (RR) of 0.66 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.48-0.91; p = 0.01) favoring OP. The risk of readmission was lower risk for OP than for IP surgery (RR 0.53, 95% CI 0.33-0.85; p = 0.008). Comparison of MP-RARP and SP-RARP revealed that OP protocols are more easily achievable with SP-RARP (44.20% vs 79.59%; p < 0.001). Conclusions and clinical implications: OP robotic urological surgery is feasible and safe in selected patients and can enhance satisfaction and reduce costs. SP robotics could promote wider adoption of SDD protocols. Strict case selection minimizes complications. Differences in health care systems should be considered in future evaluations. Patient summary: We examined the feasibility and safety of same-day hospital discharge after robot-assisted surgery for urology operations. We found that this option can be safely offered and may be even more viable if the use of robots allowing surgery through a single keyhole incision becomes more widespread.

Single port robot‐assisted pyeloplasty: An early comparative outcomes analysis

Single-port vs multi-port robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: A single center propensity score-matched analysis

Pure single-site robot-assisted pyeloplasty with the da Vinci SP surgical system: Initial experience

Single-Port Extraperitoneal vs. Multiport Transperitoneal Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis

Pyeloplasty with the Kangduo Surgical Robot Vs the Da Vinci Si Robotic System: Preliminary Results.

Single-Port Versus Multiport Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy: A Meta-Analysis

Comparison of robot-assisted single-port-plus-one pyeloplasty vs. laparoscopic single-port pyeloplasty in the treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children

Outcomes of Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty for Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction with Small Pelvis in Children

Single Port Modified Partial Nephrectomy: Novel Simultaneous Access to Peritoneal and Retroperitoneal Partial Nephrectomy, Initial Clinical Experience

Comparative Analysis of Robot Assisted Laparoscopy and Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty in the Treatment of Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction

Early post-operative outcomes of robot-assisted pyeloplasty in patients with unilateral ureteropelvic junction obstruction

Comparison of outcomes between single-port and multiport retroperitoneal robotic partial nephrectomy

Meta-analysis of robot-assisted vs conventional laparoscopic and open pyeloplasty in children.

Outpatient Robotic Urological Surgery: An Evidence-based Analysis

Head-to-Head Comparison of Modified Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty and Robot-Assisted Pyeloplasty for Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction in China.

Perioperative and oncologic outcomes of single-port versus conventional robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy: an evidence-based analysis of comparative outcomes

Single-Port Robotic Extraperitoneal Pediatric Pyeloplasty Using Low Anterior Access: Description of Technique and Initial Experience

Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Different Minimal Invasive Pyeloplasty in Treating Patients with Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction: a Network Meta-Analysis.

Perioperative and functional outcomes of single-port versus multi-port robotic-assisted radical cystectomy: evidence-based on controlled studies

Outcomes of single-port robotic ureteral reconstruction using the da Vinci SP® system

A prospective comparison of robotic and laparoscopic pyeloplasty