The Influence of Storage in Saline or Irradiation by Ultraviolet on Implant Hydrophilicity and Osseointegration:   An Experimental Study in Rabbits.

G. Lin,Yefeng Wu,F. He,Antian Xu,Chuan Zhou,Yuhao Zhu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1563/aaid-joi-D-20-00118
2021-12-26
Journal of Oral Implantology
Abstract:Storage in aqueous solution or ultraviolet (UV) irradiation  can  re t ain or regain the hydrophilicity of titanium implant surface.  In this study, t hree types of commercial titanium implants were used : ZBL (ZDI Bone  L evel ® ), CEL (C-tech Esthetic Line ® ) , and modSLA (Straumann SLActive ® ). ZBL and CEL implants were treated with UV irradiation for 4 h. Surface characterization of the four groups (ZBL, ZBL-UV, CEL-UV, modSLA)  was  evaluated by scanning electron microscopy and contact angle measurements. The  in vivo bone response  was  evaluated by removal torque (RTQ) tests and histomorphometric analysis  at  3, 6 , and 12 weeks post-implantation. A total of 144 implants and 36 rabbits were used for experiments according to a previously established randomization sequence. The  ZBL-UV, CEL-UV , andmodSLA groups were hydrophilic, and nanostructures were observed on  the  modSLA implant surface.ModSLA achieved better  RTQ value than ZBL at 12 weeks ( p <0.05). For histomorphometric analysis, ZBL-UV and CEL-UV implants showed higher bone area values in  the  cancellous bone zone at 6 weeks than  did  modSLA and ZBL  implants  ( p <0.05).In  the  cortical bone zone, all groups showed comparable bone-to-implant contact at all healing time points ( p >0.05).Both storage in saline  and UV irradiation could retain or provoke hydr o philic surfaces and improve osseointegration. Compared to storage in saline, UV irradiation displayed slight advantages in promoting new bone formation in cancellous bone zone at  an  early stage.
Medicine,Materials Science
What problem does this paper attempt to address?