Contractility, ventriculoarterial coupling, and stroke work after acute myocardial infarction using CMR‐derived pressure‐volume loop data

David Nordlund,Theodor Lav,Robert Jablonowski,Ardavan Khoshnood,Ulf Ekelund,Dan Atar,David Erlinge,Henrik Engblom,Håkan Arheden
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/clc.24216
2024-01-18
Clinical Cardiology
Abstract:Contractility, ventriculoarterial coupling, and SW in healthy volunteers and myocardial infarction (MI) patients using noninvasive pressure‐volume (PV) loop measurements. The top box illustrates generation of PV loops non‐invasively by sphygmomanometry and CMR. Variables such as Emax (used as a measure of contractility), ventriculoarterial coupling, and SW were calculated. The left graph shows an example of a PV loop in a healthy volunteer where Ea and Emax have been illustrated as the slope of the dotted lines and SW as the gray area filling the PV loop. The right graph shows an example of a PV loop in a patient during the first week after MI and is representative of the mean difference in Emax (lower), VAC (higher), and SW (lower) compared to the healthy volunteers. CMR, cardiovascular magnetic resonance, Ea, arterial elastance; Emax, maximal elastance; PV, pressure volume; SW, stroke work; VAC, ventriculoarterial coupling. Image of MRI scanner by macrovector on Freepik.com. Image of sphygmomanometer cuff by www.medisave.co.uk Background Noninvasive left ventricular (LV) pressure‐volume (PV) loops derived by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) have recently been shown to enable characterization of cardiac hemodynamics. Thus, such PV loops could potentially provide additional diagnostic information such as contractility, arterial elastance (Ea) and stroke work (SW) currently not available in clinical routine. This study sought to investigate to what extent PV‐loop variables derived with a novel noninvasive method can provide incremental physiological information over cardiac dimensions and blood pressure in patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI). Methods A total of 100 patients with acute MI and 75 controls were included in the study. All patients underwent CMR 2−6 days after MI including assessment of myocardium at risk (MaR) and infarct size (IS). Noninvasive PV loops were generated from CMR derived LV volumes and brachial blood pressure measurements. The following variables were quantified: Maximal elastance (Emax) reflecting contractility, Ea, ventriculoarterial coupling (Ea/Emax), SW, potential energy, external power, energy per ejected volume, and efficiency. Results All PV‐loop variables were significantly different in MI patients compared to healthy volunteers, including contractility (Emax: 1.34 ± 0.48 versus 1.50 ± 0.41 mmHg/mL, p = .024), ventriculoarterial coupling (Ea/Emax: 1.27 ± 0.61 versus 0.73 ± 0.17, p
cardiac & cardiovascular systems
What problem does this paper attempt to address?