Abstract:Abstract Background Patients with non-obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (nHCM) exhibit a range of anatomical variations including septal, reverse septal, apical, and concentric hypertrophy. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) with 4D flow permits assessment of haemodynamic forces (HDF) and kinetic energy (KE) of intraventricular blood flow (1,2). These parameters may indicate subclinical flow inefficiencies which may not be detectable on routine transthoracic echocardiography (3,4). The aim of this study was therefore to investigate if left ventricular (LV) HDF and KE differ between nHCM and controls, and between subgroups of nHCM. Methods Patients with nHCM (n=71) and age- and sex-matched controls (n=20) underwent CMR at 3T (Trio, Siemens) (Table 1). Patients were categorised as phenotype positive (P+) based on presence of hypertrophy (maximum wall thickness ≥15mm, or ≥13mm with a positive family history), and as phenotype negative (P-) referring to pre-hypertrophic sarcomeric variant carriers. Patients with P+ nHCM were classified into subgroups based on the pattern of hypertrophy. Left ventricular HDF and KE were computed over the cardiac cycle using validated modules (1) (Figure 1). Measurements of HDF were based on the Navier-Stokes equations (1), and analysed in three orthogonal directions as root mean square and peak values for systole and diastole. Force ratio was calculated as the sum of the two transverse components divided by the longitudinal component. The Mann-Whitney U test was used for group comparisons, Pearson analysis for correlations, and Fisher’s exact test for binary categorical data. Results P+, P- patients and controls had comparable LV ejection fraction from CMR, LV outflow tract pressure gradients, and diastolic parameters on echocardiography (Table 1). Systolic HDF and force ratio were increased, primarily in the lateral wall-septum direction in septal and reverse septal P+ patients compared to controls, but did not differ in any other directions in P+ compared to P- patients and to controls (Table 1, Figure 1). Diastolic HDF and force ratio did not differ between groups. Systolic KE was increased in P+ patients compared to P- and to controls (Table 1, Figure 1), mainly through increased KE in patients with septal and reverse septal hypertrophy. P+ patients also had increased late diastolic (A-wave) KE relative to P- patients and to controls (Table 1). Both systolic KE and force ratio correlated with maximum wall thickness in patients (r=0.31, p=0.005; r=0.43, p<0.0001). Conclusion In non-obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, left ventricular HDF and KE analysis from 4D flow CMR detect subclinical flow abnormalities. Increased systolic HDF and KE are linked to the extent and pattern of hypertrophy. Late diastolic A-wave KE was also abnormal in P+ patients despite normal diastolic velocities on echocardiography.Table 1Figure 1

Flow inefficiencies in non-obstructive HCM revealed by kinetic energy and hemodynamic forces on 4D-flow CMR

Abstract 16562: Subclinical Flow Inefficiencies in Non-Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Subgroups Revealed by 4D Flow Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance

Non-obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy exhibit subclinical abnormalities in systolic and diastolic ventricular kinetic energy and systolic haemodynamic forces on 4D flow CMR

Novel insights into diminished cardiac reserve in non-obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy from four-dimensional flow cardiac magnetic resonance component analysis

4D flow MRI and T1 -Mapping: Assessment of altered cardiac hemodynamics and extracellular volume fraction in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

Non-invasive assessment of left ventricular hemodynamic forces in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

4D Flow Component Reveals Left Ventricular Function in Atrial Fibrillation

P889Clinical significance of four-dimensional flow magnetic resonance imaging measurement of turbulent kinetic energy for hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy

P52714D-flow cardiac magnetic resonance analysis of left ventricular blood flow dynamics in mid-ventricular obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

Energetics of Cardiac Blood Flow in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy through Individualized Computational Modeling

P1827 Impact of coronary microcirculatory dysfunction in the impairment of left ventricular deformation parameters by 4D echocardiographic techniques in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients

Comparison of Four‐Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Analysis of Left Ventricular Fluid Dynamics and Energetics in Ischemic and Restrictive Cardiomyopathies

P1594 Relationship between left ventricular morphology and systolic performance and coronary microcirculatory dysfunction in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

Myocardial Contraction Fraction as a Simple Marker of Disease Severity in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

Evaluation of left ventricular blood flow kinetic energy in patients with hypertension by four-dimensional flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging: a preliminary study

Impact of 4D-Flow CMR Parameters on Functional Evaluation of Fontan Circulation

Quantitative Analysis of Left Ventricular Flow Dynamics in Latent Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Using Vector Flow Mapping

Computational analysis of ventricular mechanics in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients

Hemodynamic forces using four-dimensional flow MRI: an independent biomarker of cardiac function in heart failure with left ventricular dyssynchrony?

Image-Based Computational Hemodynamics Analysis of Systolic Obstruction in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

Longitudinal Changes in Left Ventricular Blood Flow Kinetic Energy After Myocardial Infarction: Predictive Relevance for Cardiac Remodeling