Abstract:Background: Traditional pedicle screws are currently the gold standard to achieve stable 3-column fixation of the degenerative lumbar spine. However, there are cases in which pedicle screw fixation may not be ideal. Due to their starting point lateral to the pars interarticularis, pedicle screws require a relatively wide dissection along with a medialized trajectory directed toward the centrally located neural elements and prevertebral vasculature. In addition, low bone mineral density remains a major risk factor for pedicle screw loosening, pullout, and pseudarthrosis. The purpose of this article is to review the indications, advantages, disadvantages, and complications associated with posterior fixation techniques of the degenerative lumbar spine beyond the traditional pedicle screws. Methods: Comprehensive literature searches of the PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were performed for 5 methods of posterior spinal fixation, including (1) cortical bone trajectory (CBT) screws, (2) transfacet screws, (3) translaminar screws, (4) spinous process plates, and (5) fusion mass screws and hooks. Articles that had been published between January 1, 1990, and January 1, 2020, were considered. Non-English-language articles and studies involving fixation of the cervical or thoracic spine were excluded from our review. Results: After reviewing over 1,700 articles pertaining to CBT and non-pedicular fixation techniques, a total of 284 articles met our inclusion criteria. CBT and transfacet screws require less-extensive exposure and paraspinal muscle dissection compared with traditional pedicle screws and may therefore reduce blood loss, postoperative pain, and length of hospital stay. In addition, several methods of non-pedicular fixation such as translaminar and fusion mass screws have trajectories that are directed away from or posterior to the spinal canal, potentially decreasing the risk of neurologic injury. CBT, transfacet, and fusion mass screws can also be used as salvage techniques when traditional pedicle screw constructs fail. Conclusions: CBT and non-pedicular fixation may be preferred in certain lumbar degenerative cases, particularly among patients with osteoporosis. Limitations of non-pedicular techniques include their reliance on intact posterior elements and the lack of 3-column fixation of the spine. As a result, transfacet and translaminar screws are infrequently used as the primary method of fixation. CBT, transfacet, and translaminar screws are effective in augmenting interbody fixation and have been shown to significantly improve fusion rates and clinical outcomes compared with stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Level of evidence: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Pelvic Fixation Construct Trends in Spinal Deformity Surgery

Spinopelvic fixation failure in the adult spinal deformity population: systematic review and meta-analysis

Historical Perspectives on the Evolution of Spino-Pelvic Fixation and its Implications on Clinical Care A Narrative Review

Posterior pelvic ring injuries, lumbosacral junction instabilities and stabilization techniques for spinopelvic dissociation: a narrative review

Randomized Trial of Augmented Pelvic Fixation in Patients Undergoing Thoracolumbar Fusion for Adult Spine Deformity: Initial Results from a Multicenter Randomized Trial

Triangular spinopelvic fixation for U-shaped sacral fractures and tile C pelvic disruptions: counter-nutation (anteflexion and rotation) load-bearing instability requires complementary anterior pelvic ring fixation

Lumbopelvic fixation in the treatment of spinopelvic dissociation: union, complications, and neurologic outcomes of a multicenter case series

Stability and Instrumentation Stresses Among Sacropelvic Fixation Techniques With Novel Porous Fusion/Fixation Implants: A Finite Element Study

Pelvic Ring Fractures: Does Spinopelvic Alignment Affect Sacral and Lumbopelvic Fixation Stability?

Biomechanical Analysis of a Modified Triangular Osteosynthesis Technique for Treatment of Spinopelvic Dissociation

Lumbopelvic Stabilization with Two Methods of Triangular Osteosynthesis: A Biomechanical Study

Beyond the pedicle screw–a patent review

Biomechanical evaluation of different semi-rigid junctional fixation techniques using finite element analysis

Substitutional semi-rigid osteosynthesis technique for treatment of unstable pubic symphysis injuries: a biomechanical study

Alternatives to Traditional Pedicle Screws for Posterior Fixation of the Degenerative Lumbar Spine

Anterior Pelvic Reduction and Fixation Using a Subcutaneous Internal Fixator

Numerical study of pedicle screw construction and locking compression plate fixation in posterior pelvic ring injuries: Analyzed by finite element method

Augmented Reality Versus Freehand Spinopelvic Fixation in Spinal Deformity: A Case-Control Study

Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Correction of Poliomyelitis-Related Spinal Deformities: A Comparison among Three Types of Pelvic Instrumentations

Percutaneous lumbopelvic fixation is effective in the management of unstable transverse sacral fractures

Sacropelvic Fixation with Porous Fusion/Fixation Screws: A Technical Note and Retrospective Review