Abstract:Purpose The purpose of this study was to evaluate and determine clinical outcomes and survival rates of straight and extended length subcrestal angulated (ELSA) implants (20–24 mm lengths) placed for immediate (up to 72 h post‐operative) or delayed rehabilitation (4 months post‐operative) of severely atrophic maxillae. Prosthetic treatment consisted of interim and definitive implant‐supported fixed implant‐supported prostheses with up to 3 years of function. Materials and Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted of 38 patients (five dropped out; final total was 33), treated between 2017 and 2019 in a private practice. Extended length subcrestal angulated (ELSA) implants and conventional endosseous straight implants (Southern Implants, Irene, South Africa) with (fixed) full arch prostheses were used to restore patients with edentulous maxillae immediately (within 72 hs) or delayed (4 months). ELSA implants have subcrestal angulations of 24° and 36° of the restorative platforms, external hexagon crestal anti‐rotation abutment connections, and lengths between 18 and 26 mm. Implant loading was determined by implant insertion torque values (as determined on the surgical units); 120 Ncm was the threshold level for immediate loading. Clinical and radiographic examinations were done that recorded the clinical outcomes of implants and prostheses. SPSS was used to process the data. Results Thirty‐three patients and 187 implants were included with follow‐up periods of at least 12 months (range 12–36 months). The mean age of the study population was 62.6 ± 8.4 years old (at the time of implant placement). Thirty‐three patients (86.8%) were followed for 12 months; 13 patients (39.4%) were followed for 24–35 months; 9 patients (27.3%) were followed for 36 months. In total, 13 implants in six patients failed secondary to sinus infections. Mean bone levels (MBLs) were respectively: 0.88 ± 2.12 mm at loading, –1.53 ± 2.03 mm at 12 months, –2.26 ± 1.45 mm at 24 months, and –2.54 ± 1.46 mm at 36 months. The ELSA implants showed significantly lower (p = 0.014) MBL at 36 months than did the conventional implants. One hundred thirty‐seven implants were placed and loaded within 72 h; 50 implants were placed and loaded 4 months post placement. The combined implant survival rates were 93.0% at 12 months, 91.1% at 24 months, and 100% at 36 months. The ELSA implants showed significantly lower (p = 0.014) MBLs at 36 months when compared to the conventional implants. Conclusions The results of this retrospective clinical chart review indicated that the use of ELSA implants placed into anterior maxillae and nasal crests with accentuated distal tilts (>30°) and simultaneous sinus augmentation provided favorable outcomes for prosthetic rehabilitation in patients with severe atrophic maxillae. ELSA implants placed with simultaneous sinus augmentation are an alternative option to zygomatic implants (ZI) when immediate loading is prescribed. Sinus infections were thought to be the proximate causes of all implant failures. Further long‐term clinical studies are warranted with larger patient populations.

Reconstruction of the fully edentulous maxilla using sinus grafts and bone expansion - a retrospective analysis of 50 consecutive cases

Clinical and Patient-Centered Outcomes Following Rehabilitation of Atrophic Edentulous Maxilla Using Six Implants Placed Simultaneously with Bilateral Maxillary Sinus Augmentation: A Retrospective Case Series.

Immediate reconstruction of maxilla with bone grafts supported by pedicled buccal fat pad graft.

[Retrospective Analysis of Maxillary Sinus Augmentation for Endosseous Implants].

The Use of the Facial Sinus Wall as Bone Shell Onlay Graft for Maxillary Posterior Ridge Reconstruction: A Retrospective Case Series

Restoratively driven planning for implants in the posterior maxilla - Part 1: alveolar bone healing, bone assessment and clinical classifications

Successful Secondary Reconstruction and Dental Rehabilitation for a Maxillary Bone Defect with Discontinuity after Partial Maxillectomy: A case report

A clinical long-term evaluation of implants in atrophic posterior maxilla utilizing the sinus floor augmentation technique

Immediate Implant Placement in Conjunction with Maxillary Sinus Lifting and Grafting

Rehabilitation of Reconstructed Maxilla Using Denture-Guided Epithelial Regeneration in DCIA Flap: 10-Year Follow-Up

Functional reconstruction of the maxilla and mandible: Report of 61 consecutive cases

Autogenous onlay bone grafts fixed with screw implants for the treatment of severely resorbed maxillae. Radiographic evaluation of preoperative bone dimensions, postoperative bone loss, and changes in soft-tissue profile

Long-Term Outcomes of Zygomaticomaxillary Reconstruction with Autologous Bone Grafts Supported by Pedicled Buccal Fat Pad Flap.

Bone remodeling of the sinus floor observed 19 years after third molar transplantation to close a maxillary defect: a case report

Immediate rehabilitation of severely atrophic maxillae using conventional and extended length subcrestal angulated (ELSA) implants: A retrospective analysis of 187 implants in 33 patients with up to three years of function

Long-term Results for Maxillary Rehabilitation with Dental Implants after Tumor Resection.

A graftless maxillary sinus lifting approach with simultaneous dental implant placement: a prospective clinical study

The use of particulate bone grafts from the mandible for maxillary sinus floor augmentation before placement of surface-modified implants: results from bone grafting to delivery of the final fixed prosthesis

A long-term clinic follow-up Study of maxillary sinus evaluation

A Review of Sinus Floor Elevation Techniques: Lateral Window, Transcrestal, Graft Materials, and Biologics

Immediate dentoalveolar restoration (IDR) of central maxillary incisor using sinus lateral wall block graft to regenerate loss of facial and palatal bone: Literature review and 1 year follow‐up