Comparison of Barrett Toric Calculations Using Measured and Predicted Posterior Corneal Astigmatism in Cataract Surgery Patients
Mark K Lukewich,Fahmeeda Murtaza,Sohel Somani,Eric S Tam,Hannah H Chiu,Mark Lukewich,Hannah Chiu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S351011
2022-06-02
Clinical Ophthalmology
Abstract:Mark K Lukewich, 1 Fahmeeda Murtaza, 1 Sohel Somani, 2– 4 Eric S Tam, 2– 4 Hannah H Chiu 2– 4 1 Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; 2 William Osler Health System, Brampton, Ontario, Canada; 3 Department of Ophthalmology and Vision Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; 4 Uptown Eye Specialists, Vaughan, Ontario, Canada Correspondence: Hannah H Chiu, Uptown Eye Specialists, 401-7900 Hurontario Street, Brampton, Ontario, L6Y 0P6, Canada, Tel +1 416 292-0330, Fax +1 416 292-0331, Email Aim: To compare residual astigmatism prediction errors across Barrett toric calculations using predicted posterior corneal astigmatism (PCA) and PCA measured using the IOL Master 700 with total keratometry (IOLM). Methods: A retrospective cohort study was undertaken on patients with corneal astigmatism and no other ocular comorbidities that underwent uneventful refractive femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery with toric IOL implantation between May 2019 and November 2019. Toric calculations were performed using the Barrett toric calculator and the following values: predicted PCA with anterior corneal measurements from Pentacam, IOLM standard keratometry (SK), OPD scan, and median measurements from these devices; predicted PCA with IOLM total keratometry (TK); and measured PCA with IOLM SK or IOLM TK. Residual astigmatism prediction error was calculated for each device and method of calculation at postoperative month 1 and 3 using the astigmatism double angle plot tool. Results: A total of 24 eyes, 10 with-the-rule (WTR), 10 against-the-rule (ATR) and 4 oblique astigmatism, from 24 patients were included in this study. PCA ranged from 0.00 to 0.67 D with a mean of 0.24 ± 0.15 D in all eyes. PCA was significantly greater in WTR eyes (0.32 D) compared to ATR eyes (0.16 D; p < 0.05). In ATR eyes, calculations made using IOLM SK and measured PCA had significantly lower total corneal astigmatism and toric IOL cylinder power compared to calculations made using Pentacam and IOLM TK (p < 0.05). No significant difference in mean absolute or centroid residual astigmatism prediction error was observed across devices or calculation methods. The percentage of eyes with absolute astigmatism prediction errors ≤ 0.5 D was not significantly different across groups. Conclusion: Barrett toric calculations using predicted PCA and PCA measured using IOLM produced comparable residual astigmatism prediction errors. The incorporation of median measurements did not significantly impact calculation accuracy. Keywords: astigmatism measurement, femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery, toric intraocular lens calculator, Barrett toric calculator Preoperative corneal astigmatism is common among cataract patients. 1 It is estimated that approximately 30–45% of patients requiring cataract surgery have greater than 1.0 D of corneal astigmatism, with 15–20% of patients exhibiting corneal astigmatism greater than 1.5 D. 1–3 Toric intraocular lenses (IOLs) have been shown to minimize residual corneal astigmatism and facilitate spectacle independence for distance vision following cataract surgery. 4 Refractive outcomes are dependent on precise measurement of preoperative corneal astigmatism, accurate and reliable calculation of the ideal cylindrical power and axis of the toric IOL to be implanted, and optimal positioning of high-quality toric IOLs during cataract surgery. 5 Despite ongoing advances in each of these areas, a recent meta-analysis found that the average residual astigmatism following toric IOL implantation ranges from 0.18 to 0.77 D. 4 Several devices have been developed to measure corneal astigmatism for preoperative planning. The anterior corneal surface is optimally positioned for direct imaging and has been fundamental to our understanding of corneal astigmatism. Anterior corneal astigmatism can be accurately measured using various technologies and remains a prominent variable in toric IOL calculations. Nevertheless, calculations based on anterior corneal measurements alone lead to an overestimation of total corneal astigmatism in with-the-rule (WTR) eyes and an underestimation of total corneal astigmatism in against-the-rule (ATR) eyes, highlighting the important contribution of the posterior cornea to total corneal refractive power. 6–10 Posterior corneal astigmatism (PCA) can be predicted using measurements of anterior corneal astigmatism and fixed anterior to posterior corneal thickness ratios, mathematical models and algorithms that have generally been derived from healthy, normal eyes. 6,10–13 The posterior corneal surface -Abstract Truncated-